Search This Blog

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Colonel Klebb Gets Booed in Iowa

Colonel Klebb Gets Booed in Iowa

Reposted from Sunday, December 02, 2007 3:15 PM

There are several theories on political theory, but none actually suggest or mandate inflaming part of your potential constituency. Machiavelli taught that you should do nothing novel or new and just keep to known political mechanisms used by others. The mistakes by other political masters are also very valuable to analyze.

Anybody remember George McGovern and his $10,000 minimum income?? That was the end for this Marxist.

Let us look at what Hillary did, twice[1]:

Colonel Klebb[2] [a.k.a. Hillary Clinton, one of many reputed bed partners of Bill Clinton although the DNA evidence is not available] has chosen to stubbornly persist in supporting a political platform that is not popular, and patently odious, with about 70% of the populace.

She was asked the following:

________________________________________________

Round 1

The senator was asked if she would "make a decision to give undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship" during her first 100 days in office. Clinton responded saying, "I have been favoring a plan to citizenship for years. I voted for it in the Senate, I have spoke out [sic] about it around Iowa and the country and in my campaign. And as president comprehensive immigration reform will be a high priority for me."

Soft booing could be heard from the audience.

________________________________________________

Round 2

The man repeated his question about the first 100 days. Clinton replied, "Well you've to get congress to pass the legislation and the president[sic] to do as much as possible, which I will do."

“Louder boos came from the crowd.”

This marks the beginning of the end for Hillary. She spent two years in silence after her phony socialized medicine was trashed and then toured the world several times to spread her phony concert for third world problems, paid others to work on her image, had books written for her and on and on and on. She was elected as a carpet bagger Senator in New York State and was not forced to answer any tough questions. The media [drive-by and other forms] did not push her.

Her lofty position was secure until she started slipping in the polls mainly based on her inability to stick to the truth. She is a known liar, has lied many times in the past, but that method, sanctioned by Machiavelli if it works, has cost her points in her first test before the voters. In the past, she and Billy the Bimbo Banger could waffle, flip flop and get away with it. Not in Iowa it seems.

We wonder if the Good Colonel watched Vinegar John Kerry[3] slither down the walls of the political latrines because of his flip-flopping. Perhaps.

We all know that the liberals cannot depend on more than 41% of the electorate and have to get votes from the independent party and some Republicans if possible. Kerry only added about 7 points to his solid base. Al Gore got about 9%, but lost 2% to the Green Party. In a nasty party race, Senator O’Bama, who has no credibility liabilities to date, has captured most of the standard planks of the party and differs little from Hillary. He actually supports driver’s licenses in New York, while Klebb’s flippity-floppers on that issue made her look like a fool.

Now she was caught in a vice where she cannot support driver’s licenses in her own state to avoid yet another flip flop, but can work if elected to the Oval Office to let illegal aliens vote, the absolute future of the leftist-dominated Democratic Party.

Her tax whoring does not help her in Iowa, but that is no problem for the far left who nothing else buy your money to spend on drugs, sloth, sodomy, abortion, and worse.

And, just what choice does she have? Can she offend her Marxists and illegal aliens who plan to vote for here in several key states and lie about her stance?? The left-liberal constituents are not very cognitively astute so they cannot accept a lie and a wink and support her anyway.

The other issue, which hurts Hillary, is the War on Terrorism. She needs the support of the Islamo-Fascists and other anti-Americans and some have threatened to abandon her on this issue.

Stuck between the two issues of illegal aliens and terrorism, she must somehow work out a way to grunt and grab 9-10 points and skirt the fact that she is a psychotic liar.

It will be interesting to watch her squirm out of this mess. A loss in Iowa makes her look very bad.

rycK



[2] http://rycksrationalizations.townhall.com/g/0b2f86ff-0aa8-419f-b19a-019ccef55847. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosa_Klebb. “Colonel Rosa Klebb is a fictional character from the James Bond novel and film From Russia with Love. She was played by Lotte Lenya in the film version.

Shut Up Hugo, a Message from the People!


Shut Up Hugo, a Message from the People!

Reposted from Monday, December 03, 2007 8:16 AM

El Cacalero, Hugo Chavez, was humiliated at the polls in Venezuela on Sunday. The message to shut his Marxist, money grubbing, Stalinist mouth was firm. The New York Times will not week and moan.

From the Duranty Papers, well known for their avid support of Marxism in any and all forms we read[1]:

“It was the first major electoral defeat in the nine years of his presidency. Voters rejected the 69 proposed amendments 51 to 49 percent.”

I suppose they could not stuff enough ballot boxes. They needed Daley or maybe Barbara Boxer to show how to make the numbers work. Puto Hugo missed the salient points of the following political maxim[2]: “It doesn’t matter who votes—it only matters who counts the votes,” or words to that effect. The quote, attributed to Stalin by Rush Limbaugh, (although that citation is not firmly established) should have been followed in detail by Hugo. He now looks like a fool. The people really did tell him to SHUT UP!! The quote exactly fits the mentality of cheap thugs like Hugo, Castro and his poodle Che and Pol Pot.

The political opposition erupted into celebration, shooting fireworks into the air and honking car horns, when electoral officials announced the results at 1:20 a.m. The nation had remained on edge since polls closed Sunday afternoon and the wait for results began.”

I guess so. He threatened to nationalize a couple of Spanish-owned banks.

The outcome is a stunning development in a country where Mr. Chávez and his supporters control nearly all of the levers of power. Almost immediately after the results were broadcast on state television, Mr. Chávez conceded defeat, describing the results as a “photo finish.”

The New York Times was apparently stunned. [3]

But they continue to whine and whine and whine:

““The power is for us in the community,” said Ms. Veracierta, wearing a red shirt, red cap and belt with Che Guevara’s face on it. She said she credited Mr. Chávez’s government for giving her a $3,800 loan to start a small clothing business.”

Losers deserve to lose. "Life is tough, tougher if you're stupid."
-John Wayne[4]

rycK


Colonel Klebb Gets Booed in Iowa

Sunday, December 02, 2007 3:15 PM

http://rycksrationalizations.townhall.com/g/40199e0b-c21b-4c5c-a666-f650316f612f

Colonel Klebb Gets Booed in Iowa

There are several theories on political theory, but none actually suggest or mandate inflaming part of your potential constituency. Machiavelli taught that you should do nothing novel or new and just keep to known political mechanisms used by others. The mistakes by other political masters are also very valuable to analyze.

Anybody remember George McGovern and his $10,000 minimum income?? That was the end for this Marxist.

Let us look at what Hillary did, twice[5]:

Colonel Klebb[6] [a.k.a. Hillary Clinton, one of many reputed bed partners of Bill Clinton although the DNA evidence is not available] has chosen to stubbornly persist in supporting a political platform that is not popular, and patently odious, with about 70% of the populace.

She was asked the following:

________________________________________________

Round 1

The senator was asked if she would "make a decision to give undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship" during her first 100 days in office. Clinton responded saying, "I have been favoring a plan to citizenship for years. I voted for it in the Senate, I have spoke out [sic] about it around Iowa and the country and in my campaign. And as president comprehensive immigration reform will be a high priority for me."

Soft booing could be heard from the audience.

________________________________________________

Round 2

The man repeated his question about the first 100 days. Clinton replied, "Well you've to get congress to pass the legislation and the president[sic] to do as much as possible, which I will do."

“Louder boos came from the crowd.”

This marks the beginning of the end for Hillary. She spent two years in silence after her phony socialized medicine was trashed and then toured the world several times to spread her phony concert for third world problems, paid others to work on her image, had books written for her and on and on and on. She was elected as a carpet bagger Senator in New York State and was not forced to answer any tough questions. The media [drive-by and other forms] did not push her.

Her lofty position was secure until she started slipping in the polls mainly based on her inability to stick to the truth. She is a known liar, has lied many times in the past, but that method, sanctioned by Machiavelli if it works, has cost her points in her first test before the voters. In the past, she and Billy the Bimbo Banger could waffle, flip flop and get away with it. Not in Iowa it seems.

We wonder if the Good Colonel watched Vinegar John Kerry[7] slither down the walls of the political latrines because of his flip-flopping. Perhaps.

We all know that the liberals cannot depend on more than 41% of the electorate and have to get votes from the independent party and some Republicans if possible. Kerry only added about 7 points to his solid base. Al Gore got about 9%, but lost 2% to the Green Party. In a nasty party race, Senator O’Bama, who has no credibility liabilities to date, has captured most of the standard planks of the party and differs little from Hillary. He actually supports driver’s licenses in New York, while Klebb’s flippity-floppers on that issue made her look like a fool.

Now she was caught in a vice where she cannot support driver’s licenses in her own state to avoid yet another flip flop, but can work if elected to the Oval Office to let illegal aliens vote, the absolute future of the leftist-dominated Democratic Party.

Her tax whoring does not help her in Iowa, but that is no problem for the far left who nothing else buy your money to spend on drugs, sloth, sodomy, abortion, and worse.

And, just what choice does she have? Can she offend her Marxists and illegal aliens who plan to vote for here in several key states and lie about her stance?? The left-liberal constituents are not very cognitively astute so they cannot accept a lie and a wink and support her anyway.

The other issue, which hurts Hillary, is the War on Terrorism. She needs the support of the Islamo-Fascists and other anti-Americans and some have threatened to abandon her on this issue.

Stuck between the two issues of illegal aliens and terrorism, she must somehow work out a way to grunt and grab 9-10 points and skirt the fact that she is a psychotic liar.

It will be interesting to watch her squirm out of this mess. A loss in Iowa makes her look very bad.

rycK



[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/world/americas/03venezuela.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

[2] http://malaysia.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071125103250AAXO6lW. http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/246899/As_Went_Cuba_So_Goes_Venezuela_. "The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.

It's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes."

-Josef Stalin

[4] Ref 2.

[6] http://rycksrationalizations.townhall.com/g/0b2f86ff-0aa8-419f-b19a-019ccef55847. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosa_Klebb. “Colonel Rosa Klebb is a fictional character from the James Bond novel and film From Russia with Love. She was played by Lotte Lenya in the film version.

An Open Letter about the Final Solution to Global Warming and How to Save California from Burning.


An Open Letter about the Final Solution to Global Warming and How to Save California from Burning.

Reposted from Sunday, February 10, 2008 11:46 AM

It is amusing to listen to the whines and panting of the EcoNazis as they grind and blubber over the environment. This is a most unusual political scheme as it seems that any change in temperature, weather, or anything else save the motion of the moons of Jupiter, may be used as proof that the earth is ready to boil. But, they may be right so we could conduct an experiment in a place where the True Belief and left-liberal politics can combine to make this program exciting a howling success. We can conduct the experiment in California where the population has already been educated in ecology. First we need to be educated on the fine points of this looming disaster and then hear how a group effort can save the planet, at least in the Bay Area.

THE NEED TO ACT IS URGENT:

Here are the stark facts given the True Scientists. It is best to transliterate the details for the low brow types, like us outside California, using the high-level cerebral pronunciation technique and soaring intellect of Mary Lacy, the second-most intelligent woman in the world:[1]

“Glubel vermeeng demunds ecshun noo. Sceeentists ere-a furecesteeng a vermeeng ooff betveee 2 und 11 degrees F oofer zee next centoory. Dooreeng zee lest Ice-a Ege-a zee vurld efereged oonly 9 degrees cuuler thun it is tudey. Ve-a thoos fece-a zee fery reel pusseebility ooff a sveeng in glubel temperetoores ooff Ice-a-Ege-a megneetoode-a veethin zee leeffetimes ooff oooor cheeldree. It is nu ixeggereshun tu sey thet, unchecked, glubel vermeeng veell coose-a mure-a hoomun sooffffereeng und destruy mure-a netoorel icusystems thun hes uny oozeer indoostreeel pullootunt in oooor heestury.” [2]

“Cleemete-a stebeelizeshun veell reqooure-a un ixtremely repeed trunseeshun tooerd a cleun inergy footoore-a-oone-a besed oon suler, veend und beeumess-genereted pooer, und hydrugee fooel cell feheecles. It veell teke-a a pooerffool suceeel mufement tu oofercume-a puleeticel und curpurete-a inerteea und cetelyze-a zee cleun inergy refulooshun ve-a need in oorder tu efueed uneemegineble-a chunge-a tu hoomun und netoorel systems. Ve-a need cummeetted, skeelled, persooeseefe-a cleemete-a cummooneeceturs und edfucetes tu meke-a thet mufement a reeleety.” [3]

Well, there it is. The frantic need to get green has been explained by exalted scientists and we must save the planet. Others might have a different view, but they are WRONG.[4]

Specific Suggestions for Californians:

[1] Recycle food. Microwave your wastes and donate to a friend. Form sharing groups and pass specimens around for variety. Together, you can save the planet. Eat weeds and brush as they are low in cholesterol.

[2] Stop shooting heroin, learn how to chew raw opium, hashish and peyote and thusly save the needles and associated costs and cut down on carbon dioxide emissions. No smoking marijuana. Try poking it.

[3] Stop wearing a lot of clothes. Loin cloths, group sex and huddling are more effective. Stop wearing shoes and minimize toxic gases from grazing cows. Participate in more San Francisco bath house adventures where clothes are not necessary. Massage parlors provide heat sources using ecological friendly methods and are a great place to trade political news items.

[4] Stop growing wine in California. The drains are fine for refreshment. Put buckets and bottles on your roofs.

[5] Stop taking showers. [You couldn’t’ tell in many parts of Oakland. anyway]. Soap will not be needed.

[6] Cars must be banned. No electricity No TV. No computers or lights. Use the roads to dry grass, cacti and weeds to conserve. Use moonlight for nighttime adventures and political rallies that celebrate the cooling of the earth.

[7] Instead of newspapers and phones use drums and sign language.

[8] Set the marginal tax rate to 110% and confiscate all the wealth so everybody can enjoy true equality.

[9] Vote for Al Gore and Hillary Clinton daily. The ballot need only have these two names on it for centuries.

If only half the Californians would adopt these simple measures, we could lower the average temperature in the Golden State by at least 0.0003 deg F in the next few decades!!

Ecological Suggestions from a Californian in Exile.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

rycK's several best piX from rycK's rantZ


The Preposterous Notion of ‘Fixing’ the Derivatives Market and Other Follies.
Meet the Real Villains of the Financial Crisis—the CRA [Community Reinvestment Act], “Affordable Housing” and the US Government
Potentially the Biggest Stock Scam of the Century: The General Motors IPO. http://ryckki.blogspot.com/2010/08/potentially-biggest-stock-scam-of.html
Polishing the Pedestal of the Stooges: EcoNazism threatened by Big Oil and the Charge of the Leftist Cavalry
Mangled Messages from Germany over "multikulti" and the Failure of Muslims to Assimilate
Europe’s Struggles Over their Egalitarian Failures to Assimilate Muslims into their Societies
Like a Rotten Pumpkin California Sags and Oozes into Financial Oblivion
Maximizing Both Tax Revenues and Economic Growth: The Folly of Government and the Generation of Phony Numbers and Class Warfare
The Road to Social Success, Peace and Justice: California has NO Vision!
The Futile Attempt of Forcing Equality Among the Masses.
The Bursting of the GanGreen Bubble.
The Coming Age of Debt Defaults: The US May have to Lead the Way and Default on All Debts. We Must Learn New Ways to Live and Survive.
Spain’s Solar Energy Bubble Bursts. California is Next. The First of a Series of GanGreen Asset Bubbles Bursting.
Taxation on the Knife’s Edge: The Lower Half Will Always Vote for Higher Taxes.
The Debt-Deflation Trap and the Psychosis of Government Spending
Copulating with Coprolites: The Unveiled Mechanism of Governance by Progressive Liberalism in California
An Economic Parade of Swans: White, Black and Now Brown, the Ugliest Swan.
The Old Red Lady from the Old Gray Lady Instructs us in Slogans, Obscure Literary References and Clichés.
Gangrening the Greenback as Explained by Warren Buffett. Liberalism Has New Excuses for Spending and Printing Money.
The Collapse of the World Economy is at Hand.
Obama Receives the Ultimate Insult: The Swede's Bozo Prize for Leftist Stooges.
Krugman Receives the Ultimate Insult: The Swede's Bozo Prize for Leftist Stooges.
Can the Global Warming Zombies Admit they look like Fools Even Yet??
Hokum, Blow and the Electric Car Follies Exposed

Propaganda Alert: The New York Times Axes the Right Questions and then Answers Them with the Left Answers.

Propaganda Alert: The New York Times Axes the Right Questions and then

Answers Them with the Left Answers.

Reposted and edited from 6.13.2008

We can always appreciate the propagandistic essays of the NYT—aka the Walter Duranty Papers[1]-- as they attempt to ‘form public opinion’ thus redacting history and settling the matter of the lesser masses who are not liberals. . Somebody once said that history must be controlled to justify the future.[2] We hear about the Obama Change from the Babbling Brooks today.

Is Barack Obama really a force for change, or is he just a traditional Democrat with a patina of postpartisan [sic] rhetoric?[3] [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Ah, a new word! Postpartisan is defined [4] as something like pulling together a coalition of various people in a national consensus or other such fluff. Hillary denounced this in the link in the footnotes. This is some snake oil political notion that we can transcend politics and ‘work for the common good.” That was back in January David—please try to keep up.

Now, David, do we know what the answer will be after you conscientiously search out the matter and ponder numerous matters? Is this a circular essay where the punch line grows like a slow bladder tumor along the way and then we are instantly enlightened with sunshine and have the primordial urge to rush out and vote for a liberal Democrat with a 100% far left voting record? That would be so wonderful and so progressive.

That question is surprisingly hard to answer. When you listen to his best speeches, you see a person who really could herald a new political era. But when you look into his actual policies, you often find a list of orthodox liberal programs that no centrist or moderate conservative would have any reason to support.”

Brooks has broached the outer limits of betrayal and rabble-rousing and other anti- liberal sins before and we wonder if he still has a job after asking this question in this manner? Is he a spy for Rush? Did he just say that the Obama plans were just leftist clichés? Did Frank Rich have to rewrite most of this?

We quiver with excitement to see how he can break away from this snake pit he has built for himself. The rule in manufacturing snake pits is to select those specimens that look nasty but do not actually bite. I wonder if his supervisor had to rewrite some of this.

To investigate this question, I looked more closely into Obama’s education policies.”

Ah, we restrict the field so our ‘answer’ cannot conflict with leftist elitist dogma. Slick. You could have looked at his voting record on terrorism, foreign aid, taxes and attacks on the military. The pie shrinks. The conclusion is then obvious.

Our Babbling Brooks now babbles for several paragraphs [read filler as in meat extenders and such] about ‘two camps’ of educational thinkers: those status quo types who think the current system is working and those reformers who want brutal changes in the process. This now broaches the old cliché: which of the two choices appeal to you? That is like asking a condemned man to dig his own grave facing either North to South or East to West to be fair. Brooks does not mention the Jeremiah Wright Christian ‘education’ that Obama and Michelle got in the pews for 20 years. What did he learn from Jeremiah? Minister Farrakhan. [5]? Michael Pfleger.[6]? Ayers?

The question of the week is: Which camp is Barack Obama in?”

Here it comes!! A decision!

Then, he mumbles and sez, effectively that Obama has endorsed both sides!!

He proposes dozens of programs to build on top of the current system, but it’s not clear that he would challenge it. He’s all carrot, no stick. He’s politically astute — giving everybody the impression he’s on their side — but substantively vague. Change just isn’t that easy.”

Whammo! Obama is a mealy mouth mumbler!! [Political vagueness = mealy mouthism]

Brooks sum up:

Obama endorses many good ideas and is more specific than the McCain campaign, which hasn’t even reported for duty on education. But his education remarks give the impression of a candidate who wants to be for big change without actually incurring the political costs inherent in that enterprise.”

Does that mean he is a phony baloney tax whoring Democrat?? Does that mean he does not how to pay for such a new program? Duh? Hike taxes! We did read that he favors new ‘programs’ that are always costly and ineffective in the hands of liberals. Does that count? How about: choose either one and your taxes will soar! Brooks got it left when he mentioned that the new Obama plans do not suit centrists or moderate conservatives. Does he need the votes of these Nazis? Maybe Obama can take his plan ‘to the people’ and let them decide.

Tax whoring by any other name is tax whoring. That is all the liberals have left.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com



[1] In honor of that celebrated Communist stooge and liar and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for the NYT. The color RED is used in my essays in honor of Walter Duranty, a saint, if there could be one, in the Marxist Archives of Honor.

[2] I said that.

[3] Obama, Liberalism and the Challenge of Reform By DAVID BROOKS Op-Ed ColumnistPublished: June 13, 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/opinion/13brooks.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin. All quotes in this essay reference this link unless otherwise stated. Empahsis is mine in all quotes. [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

[4]WASHINGTON - Exploiting a deep well of voter revulsion over partisan gridlock in Washington, Sen. Barack Obama is promising to do something that has not been done in modern U.S. politics: Unite a coalition of Democrats, Republicans and independents behind an agenda of sweeping change.

But in pitching himself as a "postpartisan" politician, Obama, D-Ill., is the latest in a string of presidential candidates promising to remake Washington into a city that sings in unison. George W. Bush was to be a uniter, not a divider. Bill Clinton was going to put people first. Even Richard Nixon, on the day after the 1968 election, invoked a sign he had seen during the campaign that said, "Bring Us Together," and said that was the goal of his administration.

Washington, however, has a way of consigning such rhetorical hopes to the partisan waste bin.

"Words are not actions," Sen. Hillary Clinton said Saturday night during a Democratic debate in New Hampshire, as she called for a "reality brake" on her rivals' rhetoric. "As beautifully presented and passionately felt as they are, they are not action." http://www.mercurynews.com/presidentelect/ci_7901567 and echoed by others: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/06/AR2008010602402.html