The Intrinsic Degeneracy of Social Liberalism
and Other Leftist Political Systems.
First published 5/07/2008 Revised 5.04.2016
We
must, at times, make reasonable inspections of how our political systems work
and what their goals might be. Just listening to the speeches and reading
canned litanies of authorized propaganda have little meaning for the average
citizen. The slick ads on TV and radio
are mostly designed to appeal and convert a very few persons over to a local
candidate. The temptation for the
politicians to ‘tell the people what they want to hear” is too successful [and is
socially fatal at times] to be ignored by those who work the political levers
for fame and power and fortune.
Going
to the encyclopedia in search of a clear explanation of liberalism, a once-
solid and authoritative reference point of truth and facts of centuries since
Diderot and Voltaire created it; we get essentially nothing, or worse. Here is
the Wikipedia definition of liberalism:
“Liberalism refers to a broad array of
related ideas and theories of government that consider individual
liberty to be the most important political goal.[1] Modern liberalism
has its roots in the Age of Enlightenment.”
[Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
This
is so phony [and way too broad] as to prompt a frantic search for something to disencumber
a sudden urge to vomit. The nostrum that
the individual might be involved in contemporary liberalism in some places
other than as ‘leaders’ or sages or party elders or elected officials is a sick
joke. The general error here is based on the necessity to avoid the confusion
between 18th century liberalism and its current perverted form as espoused
by the Party of Democrats.
These used to be
‘liberal tenets:’
[1]
Freedom of thought and speech
[2]
Limitations on the power of governments
[3]
Strict enforcement of the rule of law
[4]
The free exchange of ideas,
[5]
A capitalist market system or mixed economy
[6]
Transparent system of government.
These are ‘social
liberal’
tenets and specifics on what they favor:
[1]
Real freedom can only exist when citizens are healthy, educated, and free from
dire poverty.
[2]
The right
to an education, the right to health care, and the right to a minimum wage.
[3]
Laws against discrimination in housing and employment
[4]
Laws against pollution of the environment,
[5]
The provision of welfare, including unemployment benefit and housing for the
homeless,
[6]
All the above supported by progressive taxation.
This
all sounds very good until you get into the implementation and totalitarianism
of those who would enforce these principles by confiscating the money and
wealth of the citizens who have these rights.
Such is the radicalism that leads to millions of people being murdered by
leftists who claimed they were liberal and wanted to create a better society.
The French Revolution
This
exercise [there were actually two French Revolutions] was triggered by inflation
and unrest and hatred against the old feudal class of Europe. There was little noble about this mess as the
landholders were marched before the guillotine in the Terror.[5]
A revolutionary dictatorship was
installed by people like Jean-Paul Marat, as usual in any leftist revlution, to kill off the opposition and confiscate wealth. They passed
‘laws’ such as Law of Suspects where
anybdy could be accused of any crime agaisnt the state and summarily executed
by the army or mobs. These people were an utter
failure, and inspired Marx and other utter failures to copy their dirty work.
We shall continue to encounter the central theme of leftistism, mangled in the
soggy nostrum as liberalism, as we dig deeper into history and the outcomes of
politifal movements.
The
Russian Revolution
It seems like this ought to be a closed matter given the
utter failure and degenerative outcomes of this October Revolution and its
conjeners since 1917. There were several
movements against the Tsar and some provisional government [the Duma] partially
set up by him.
This thing was a disaster for the world
and, not so stra ngely as one would expect, is still revered as the ‘right
choice’ for governments by the far left. They
cling to the stubborn and wholly unsubstantiated belief that the notion
was correct although some mistakes were made. There are a host of perverted
apologists who still belileve in the revolution of the prolateriat [now read
peasants] and the wholesale murder of capitalists. Examples are Shining Path,
Party of Democrats Progressive Caucus, anyhwere in Africa, Cuba and parts of
South America, South East Asia and certain parts of Europe.
The liberals still parrot the Communist Manifest in whole
or in part for their politial precepts. Many have spun outrageous lies to
justify the murder of millions such as Walter Duranty ,
the Patron
Saint of the New York Times. The cliché about the pen being mightier than the sword does actually apply
to this social parasite. Many others
paved his way by ignoring the
excesses of the Bolsheviks, Lenininsts, Troskyites and Stalinists such as
Bernard Shaw,
the most famous person in the world in 1931. George Bernard Shaw moaned about equality
as he relaxed on the French Rivera or at his splendid castle in Ireland.
Modern day apologists such as Paul Krugman, Frank Rich, Cornel West, Susan
Sontag, Noam Chomsky
and others with lesser wit and diminutive cognitive skills translate the lust
and hatred for power into convenient social ‘equality’ elements as a crude
excuse to grab power and exclude capitalists wherever possible. Chomsky, like
Duranty, tried to apologize for the Khmer Rouge massacres of probably a million
Cambodians with mindless fluff:
“Space limitations preclude a comprehensive
review, but such journals as the Far Eastern Economic Review, the London
Economist, the Melbourne Journal of Politics, and others elsewhere, have provided analyses by highly qualified specialists who
have studied the full range of evidence available, and who
concluded that executions have numbered at most in the thousands; that these
were localized in areas of limited Khmer Rouge influence and unusual peasant
discontent, where brutal revenge killings were aggravated by the threat of
starvation resulting from the American destruction and killing.”
This
is typical of the left. This is liberalism in flower. They were trying to do
the right thing when they murdered
people with education and soft hands or who wore glasses. Let us blame America [read
capitalism] for horrors created by anti-capitalists in other parts of the
world. If the top 1% of the citizens of
the US
were murdered and their wealth confiscated we would read such an apology by
some simpering dupe who thinks like this parasite Chomsky. Space limitations [in my essay]
preclude a comprehensive review of such parasitism and ghoulish murder. Castro
murdered 10,000 in Cuba
and he is only celebrated as a hero who overthrew Juan Batista. Fidel now eats
expensive meats and lives in splendor as did Stalin, Tito, Mugabe, Kim and
other degenerates who murdered people for their wealth using liberalism as a crude excuse. People
like Olof Palme applaud their works and condemn the United States. Olof called US soldiers in Viet Nam ‘Nazis’ in
an article for the Asian Edition of Time about 1967 and in a radio speech in 1972.
Of course, the cowardly and pro-Marxist Swedes, posing as peace mediators, sold
guns to all sides for 200 years and directly participated in the murder of
millions while being more than cozy with Hitler in the late 30s, but all that
is beside the fact. Palme was shot in the back probably for reneging on a dirty
missile deal with Iran.
One of his cabinet gun-running types just fell in front of a train soon after.
Many,
like George F. Kennan,
William F. Buckley, George Will, Phyllis Schlafly and many others have warned us of the nasty and brutal
monsters that hide behind the fluff and counterfeit facades of liberalism and
have been denigrated and caustically abused by the left. The phony economics of the left have been
exposed many times [by Hayek
and others] and still the tax whores
grunt and grab for higher and higher taxes, the economic equivalent of the
guillotine.
The EcoNazis
The
totalitarian types insist on preaching their narrow views on any subject and
murder, jail, banishment and, most prominent for the left, confiscation of
personal property are predictable political methods. The latest scheme to tax
the entire world is the EcoNazi carbon tax. It seems that they have found that
CO2 is a poison and a product of capitalism and needs to be taxed.
Al Gore,
the communist stooge, has flown around the world in his wonderful jet teaching
others to conserve energy while he makes $100,000,000 off the phony cap and
trade scams that are burying Europe in debt,
taxes and social problems. The scientific evidence shows that CO2
does not correlate
with surface temperature changes
and this disgraceful fact is ignored by the left who call themselves
‘scientists’ and who, for money purposes, assert that the matter is ‘closed. ‘
This
is typical of Marxism: any distortion or lie that allows money and wealth to be
confiscated is tolerated. Even science has been dist0rted to gain money and
power even though no element of science is every ‘closed’ or off the table for
debate and scrutiny.
Science does not work that way.
Eternal Racism
No
matter what, the political lever of reverse racism is pulled daily and has now
converted 98% of the black vote to the leftists of the Party of Democrats. Affirmative Action, busing, quotas, and other
phony social programs and statutes do nothing but enhance racism, the very
foundation of the left.
Racists like Jeremiah Wright, Al Sharpton
["What’s wrong
with denouncing white interlopers?"], Jesse Jackson, Bill
Clinton and Hillary Clinton,
Kamau Kambon
[“…exterminate white people off the face of
the planet and Geraldine Ferraro
[until recently and now the most visible ‘racist’ in the Party of Democrats],
Mike Nifong,
Malik Shabazz,
Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer and many others are never challenged for their
racist and racially biased antics by the left. Senator Barack Obama can tell us
about the ‘typical
white person’ and denigrate whites
for “clinging to
their guns and religion’ and escape any accusations of overt racism
by the left. Obama is an ideological racist, a bigot, an arrogant elitist and a
racism enabler and all this welcomed by the rabid left as they grunt and grab
at the tax base. He can listen to the rabid racist howls of Jeremiah Wright and
see nothing out of the ordinary. He
cannot disown his pastor or church he said. Then, he did.
So, we always find the
same clichés and tautological notions embedded in liberalism and some can be
summarized here:
[1]
They will murder anybody for wealth and power. They have murdered 100,000,000
souls since 1917 alone. They will support any such actions in Africa,
South America or elsewhere if they can if they
threaten capitalism or western ideals.
[2]
They will concoct any lie or invent any scam to get money and power. They will suppress, redact, fudge, copy,
plagiarize or abstract any written materials that they can exploit by turning
them into propaganda.
They teach far left liberalism as basic education.
[3]
They will distort any facet of society like science or religion or nationalism to
further their ends and lust for money and power. They celebrate degeneracy and drug addiction.
[4]
To get power, they will deliberately invent and staff phony and unworkable
social programs that are designed to fail and only consume more taxes.
[5]
They utilize the notion of ‘equality’ where none ever exists or ever could to
‘prove’ that capitalism is unjust and suggest higher taxes and more social
programs to force equality upon the masses.
[6]
Their best political weapon is reverse racism where inequality is touted and
any and all means to achieve equality are phony and counter productive, but
politically effective. Second to racism is sloth, sodomy and drug addiction in
that order.
[7]
The ‘individual’ must be suppressed and those who can circumvent the clumsy
rules and governments of the left should be terminated. Liquidation using the
Stalinist definition is fine with the left if capitalists are the target.
[8]
Personal property is an affront to socialism and the left. Wealth must be confiscated.
[9]
The power of the vote must be suppressed and election results doctored to
produce the most desirable outcome for the left.
[10]
There is no human act, however disgusting or illegal they might be, that cannot
be celebrated and trumpeted by the left for political reasons.
[11]
They will worship and foster and aid any
enemy of the United States
as they did for the Communists and Islamo-Fascisti and lie about their support.
They will harbor and celebrate illegal aliens who sell narcotics and murder
citizens and protect them from the authorities.
[12]
They will distort or pervert any statue or law by the courts or litigation that
will serve their interests. They will
substitute their own versions of multiculturalism for the standard rights known
as equality and freedom.
And, somehow these parasites stay in power. Vote accordingly.
rycK
G. Bernard Shaw gave a
thousand speeches on ‘equal incomes’ and could never be coaxed into telling
anybody how this might be accomplished. A reference to G. Bernard Shaw. From whom Shavian, or in my usage Shavianism
was named. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bernard_Shaw.
Herbert
Stooges for the “Studies” by Leftist Think Tanks and Translates their
Objectives: Higher Taxes
http://www.historyguide.org/europe/kennan.html
Thursday, January 03,
2008
3:01 PM
Thursday, November 29,
2007
4:14 PM
Monday, January 28, 2008 10:46 AM
Wednesday, December 12,
2007
1:52 PM
Friday, April 27, 2007 7:28 AM
Racism, the Basis of the
Party of Democrats as Explained by Paul Krugmann of the NYT
Obama: Pitiful Liar and Caretaker of Black Liberation Theology
Racism
“After days of digging at Mr. Obama for saying that working-class voters
turn xenophobic or “cling to guns and religion”
because they’re bitter over lost jobs, Mrs. Clinton couldn’t resist a new nasty
attack ad. What she has yet to figure out is that she ends up hurting herself —
feeding her negative image — by attacking too
long and with too much relish.”
Kamau Kambon, an author who taught in NCSU's
Africana Studies program as recently as last spring, made the comments Oct. 14
during a conference at Howard
University in Washington. The
conference was televised nationally by C-SPAN, and bloggers picked up on the
comments immediately.”
Nifongism and the New
Nifongalongs
“You go into these small towns in
Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been
gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them.And they fell through the Clinton
Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration
has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not."
"And it's not surprising then they get
bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy
to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade
sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/356191.aspx
Propaganda Gem: Krugman Distorts History as He Grubs for More Taxes.
Propaganda
Gem: Frank the Crank Clarifies Anger for the
Women Voters and the Polls Show Obama Wins the Most Women!
Propaganda
Alert: The New York Times Axes the Right Questions and then
Answers
Them with the Left Answers.
Friday, February 08,
2008
10:16 AM
Wednesday, January 16,
2008
8:51 AM
http://rycksrationalizations.townhall.com/g/1a8b21b3-4d72-4558-bece-fce7920b4d13
Monday, January 07, 2008 11:25 AM
The Road to Social
Success, Peace and Justice: California
has NO Vision!