21,000 Scientists Refute the Phony Global Warming Follies as The Biggest Attempt to Tax The World Has Even Seen.

All leftist politics is based on the notion of redistribution of wealth through the mechanisms of taxes, violent revolution or intimidation mediated with lies and misinformation assisted with propaganda. This current tax exercise began with the 1990 Kyoto Protocol. There have been several phony ‘programs’ and examples of proposed international legislation that seek to reverse the rise of temperature attributed to human activity. There are no firm scientific data that show a correlation of carbon dioxide gas levels in the atmosphere that mathematically correlates with temperature changes. The scientific method demands that any hypothesis must incorporate all pertinent data into any model that may be proposed. The problem with their conclusions and predictions is that cause and effect of the ‘pollutant’ gas, known as carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) is shown to change in manner that does not match a similar trend in temperature. The matter is complex and many scientists and political operatives vie for power and juicy research grants in this exercise in politics. [1]

I am a retired senior research scientist from the chemical industry, an inventor and product developer with six patents, 24 peer-reviewed scientific papers and a dozen successful products that have generated more than 50 million dollars in sales. I was skeptical about the Kyoto Protocols as only the United States was to make major cuts in fossil fuel energy production giving a ‘pass’ to China and India and most of third world. I was finally convinced when I attended a lengthy and in-depth scientific presentation by Professor David Legates of University of Delaware. [2] His presentation was very direct in terms of what the data show and how models cannot predict the outcomes of weather. He has no political agenda. More proof that this thesis on Global Warming is political comes from the Delaware governor. Governor Ruth Ann Minner, a Democrat, who has a G.E.D. as her crowning academic achievement, demonstrated that this was a political dissertation when she “… prohibited Legates from using his title as state climatologist of Delaware in his public statements related to climate change” [3] Translated, this means that any opposition to this attempt to raise global taxes must be suppressed and that any smear tactics available to politicians may be used at will. She also supports the phony and expensive Bluewater Wnd project that will hike electricity costs some 500% . [4]We are led to believe that the facts are in and commentary is not allowed. We heard this in other political arenas such as busing, welfare, The Great Society and more. The left only exists economically on the products and wealth of their victims and a chance for a massive tax increase cannot be ignored.

Matching the mental menisculicity of Minner is Al Gore, the famous scientist from Tennessee who also presents ‘scientific’ proof that the temperature is rising with charts and graphs. The Russians have recently published their comments on this political circus pointing out that the sun has the controlling effect on global temperatures and that a cooling period may be next. [5] The eminent scientist Al Gore has announced that the scientific matter is ‘closed’ and we must begin with carbon emission caps and work out some kind of carbon credit market to solve this problem. Did Al Gore flunk out of seminary? The fact that Gore and his father are intimately intertwined with Marxism for a few generations out to be tip off as the far left wants to attack capitalism and curtailing the energy usage is the best way. Hillary Clinton endorses this ‘cap and credit’ system on her current website. [6] Her ties with Marxism and taxation are legendary.[7]

The Petition Reads:

“We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”[8]

I have a general distrust of politicians as their craft is not based on truth but on persuasion. The disgraced Russian politician and pseudo scientist Lysenko and US liberals have much in common.[9] When I see some movement where huge tax revenues are to be directed into specific areas where politicians or their supplicants may benefit I become suspicious. I have commented before on Global Warming. [10] We saw some ‘computer models’ predict 14 major hurricanes after Katrina of the next year [there were zero] and ‘about the same’ for 2007 and we also saw zero! Where is the top-shelf science in weather prediction when we get 0 for 14 twice in a row?  We saw the beginning of this brand of phony science with the 1972 with the publication of the book The Limits to Growth [11] , a book that made hilarious predictions and made the authors look like fools as they used their ‘computer model’ to alert us that we would run out of out of oil by 1992,  diminish our supplies of  copper and  lead about the same time and then run  out of natural gas by 1993.  Is there no shame here? Can the political left think they can just make wild predictions and that we must follow their follies? Why can they not explain where their predictions went wrong?  The answer is political.

We must remember Rachel Carson’ Silent Spring[12] and the phony ‘science’ behind the DDT ban that was not based on good science. This was a political victory for the far left who vacated the government pressure groups world wide when the USSR crashed in 1989. That is when the Sierra Club and other organizations suffered an influx of far left political operatives who have only an attack on capitalism as their thrust. I have discussed some of this phony science before.[13] This is not science; this is gutter-level politics of the far left. Their psychotic hatred of capitalism is driving this phony Global Warming Circus as a means of producing the biggest tax haul in the history of the Universe.

The current Global Warming effort is political and destructive to our economy.

Vote accordingly

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

---

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_controversy#Petitions

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Legates

[3] Montgomery, Jeff. "State distances itself from climatologist", The News Journal, 2007-02-22. Retrieved on 2007-07-28. 

[4] Bluewater Follies and EcoNazism in Delaware.

[5] http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080103/94768732.html. A cold spell soon to replace global warming

13:54 | 03/ 01/ 2008 . MOSCOW. (Oleg Sorokhtin for RIA Novosti) – Stock up on fur coats and felt boots! This is my paradoxical advice to the warm world.

[6] http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/middleclass/

[7] Hillary and the Tax Whores Chant the Same Old Stale Tunes: Grunt and Grab

[8] Oregon Petition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Petition

[9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism.

[10] Fat Albert Waddles Off To Bark His Global Warming Follies As The Russians Buy Furs.

Quack Science, Global Warming and the Wild Flight from Reason: Is Al Gore our New Lysenko?

Comments On Global Warming and Failed Computer Models

[11] The Limits to Growth in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limits_to_Growth.

[12] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_Spring.

[13]http://rycksrationalizations.townhall.com/g/7063dcde-b734-46bb-afa7-e2dbc26930fa

“… one of her[Carson]  chapters reads like a Lillian Hellman play and was entitled:  “A Fable for Tomorrow” that outlined how “life had been silenced” by the pesticide DDT. Or we could mention Margaret Mead’s crass political stunt[13] in the infamous and phony Coming of Age in Samoa replete with maudlin theater and ‘definitive’ research that was limited to an interview from a single couple. We must note that these two pieces of phony science are still celebrated by many so-called scientists in the best traditions of Lysenko. There is no science in these two examples, but science is implied and the correct political message is loudly touted. That is enough for a political crusade.