Individualism
The leftist notions of egalitarianism were previously
discussed and shown to be so much trash in the first part in this series: A
Theoretical Deconstruction of Liberalism I.
We continue the dissection and public exposure of this virulent social
disease with the second part. We need to discuss the leftist notions and myths
of "individualism." This notion is proffered to be primarily
concerned with "...protecting individual autonomy by opposing encroachment
by the state. Ref http://www.answers.com/topic/individualism
“This is not to be confused with the alternate liberal usage of the word where
people who attempt to be independent of big government are assaulted and
ridiculed for such actions also labeled as "individualism." The
liberal constantly reminds the person who seeks "individualism" (read
freedom from excessive taxes) that their government has already given them
much.
This definition of “opposing encroachment by the state” is
unworkable now given the practices of the left. Apparently the left think that
control of crime is some form of encroachment upon freedoms of the individual.
Radical individualism is now apparently concerned with simply 'feeling good.'
If an act is pleasing or highly offensive to many, such as we note in an assortment of current popular
social perversions, then it must be a good thing for liberals to do, and needs
to be nurtured and advocated, and as such, this conduct
must be invariably found to be
‘protected’ by the Constitution. Drug addiction is a good example. The
rabid left pine and howl for legalized drugs in the manner of the late Carl
Sagan, a big-time hophead marijuana smoking loser with a really sloppy and
embarrassing scientific record. Recently, a new ‘right’ has been asserted for
sexual predators to attack children by some pervert. The ACLU has a new ‘right’ to champion! Justice
Ginsberg, former ACLU Head Counsel, urges
the age of sexual consent to be lowered to 12 {I think 10 or less] so as
to decriminalize such a right. This is just another step in the leftist support
for government sanctioned and tax-sponsored degeneracy, a seemingly main pillar
of the progressive Democratic Party in the USA . It does get votes.
The left gaze at the inner-city 'citizens' use of mainline
narcotics, barbs, methamphetamine, and such, and praise their use as conforming
to norms of 'diversity.' We heard from Tim Leary and Allen Ginsberg of the
‘mind expanding benefits’ of drug addiction. Liberals were thrilled by their
adventures into addiction, sloth, and addiction. The social cost of their
addictions: failed lives, discarded children, death, sloth, disease, despair
and such are ignored or enthusiastically overlooked if the proper votes are
cast. After all, jobs are created when degeneracy is exploited to its fullest
extent. Somebody has to tend the afflicted and pay for the yellow rubber gloves
and disinfectants where appropriate. Under liberalism drug addicts and their
social workers can form a common social bond and even share needles if they
want. The poor are encouraged to take drugs as they howl at the system
seemingly giving them a platform of social protest. Killing yourself with drugs
is akin to self-directed starvation: it is a social message. Please note that
the high human population of the world is a major factor in leftist politics
and that those who die from drugs are appeasing left-liberal Democratic population
policy. Phony social programs that offer
free needles to 'prevent the spread of AIDS,’ and worse, are a mere official
left-liberal political statement to the abusers:
“We like your addiction, we will
support your habits and we will get more tax monies to help fund the enormous
cost of your addiction. We benefit from your suffering and seek to enhance our
political power from your right to use drugs.
We can provide abortions at minimal cost, or even free, to help you free
yourselves from the usual social responsibilities so you can pursue your
numerous addictions, public whoring and perversions. Free housing and medical treatments
are already provided. Shoot up in confidence that there is more on the way if
you support liberalism. You can ‘Tune in, turn on, and drop out’ and be
properly aligned with liberalism.”
There are several aspects to this left-liberal
‘individualism’ notion that need examination and comment:
(1)A general contempt for any 'normal' life: Liberals are
thrown into a vomiting episode at the mention of the TV Show Father Knows Best.
The traditional family setting is unacceptable. Here, we see a general assault
on common decency, American society and capitalism. We have seen much of this
before. Liberalism has no future in common decency and morality and must find
ways to counterbalance their political power. Decent folk will just vote for
crime, corruption, sloth, degeneracy and Marxism.
(2)The frustration of being politically powerless: The leftist leaders are obviously
phony, flip-flop in the Kerry manner on any issues, have many disgusting persons
as leaders, praise communism, employ criminals and major substance abusers for
leaders and are anti American and pro Islamo-Fascist and pro Marxist. Much of
this frantic attitude has to do with their loss of political power. It was
interesting to watch Cynthia McKinney escorted by the Black Panthers who
provided ‘security’ for her in her futile efforts to hang onto her
Congressional Seat in George. Such overt use of racism is an integral part of
the left-liberal agenda of 2006 and the elections of 2008. Such frustrations
will drive the Democrats to do anything that is necessary to support another
911 attack so they can blame the Republicans and get back some control of the
government. Race riots always seem to benefit the left as they did in Watts 1, 2 They are now crazed with hate and we have only
to listen to Michael Moore, Cynthia McKinney or George Soros to hear the
accepted Democratic Party line in detail on these subjects.
(3)The ongoing quest for more votes and the need to preserve
inner city voting patterns [hence hyping the Blue] lead to the following
observations: New Orleans
was a toilet of corruption, sloth, drug addiction and racism, but it was a
solid Democratic bastion of voters. The high vote content was sufficient for
the liberals to maintain the status quo of the city using any and all methods,
illegal or not and ignoring the crime was mandatory. Katrina changed that. This loss is unacceptable to the liberals in
LA, CA and MA. The leftist powers now whine and moan for federal money to
transport the ‘poor’ back to the voting booths in Louisiana to maintain this disgusting leftist
social bastion of votes. The governor of LA asked for $50,000,000,000 to fix
things. That would have made her the biggest Tax Grubber in the history of the
world, adjusted for growth and inflation, and probably a bit ahead of Cleopatra
VII. Note that crime in New Orleans has recently skyrocketed to ‘normal’
and the ‘police’ have to use the National Guard to patrol the streets. But,
they are voting Democrat—so that must be maintained! They just reelected their
resident sleaze bag. The same corrupt
officials must be reelected according to the liberal agenda. NOLA here is a
mirror image of the corruption and crime in Daley’s Chicago , Kennedy’s Boston , and Green’s Philadelphia or anytime in Baltimore . Next, they will try to allow
illegal aliens to vote anywhere and get back to their traditional ballot box
stuffing of the 30s, 40s, and 50s in Chicago
as their model. They are already bribing illegal aliens to vote for them with
give aways such as tuition credits, free health care, freedom from federal
taxes and such.
As with the case of radical egalitarianism, the leftist
notions of individualism are disgusting, immoral and have no place in a modern
society.
rycK
No comments:
Post a Comment