Copulating with Coprolites: The Unveiled
Mechanism of Governance by Progressive Liberalism in California
Revised and orginally published
6.23.2009
Copulating with Coprolites: The Unveiled Mechanism
of Governance by Progressive Liberalism in California [1]
There
has been much imbecilic blathering and blue sky gazing since our ancients
attempted to organize various societies into some form of governable mass. Most
of the attempts [and even histories of the attempts] are worth not so much as
their weight in dry cat litter given even a brief reflection on how things
turned out in many societies. The historians are not reliable, we find after
some analyses and comparison of parallel accounts of the same incidents, as the
temptation to redact the original records and to insert excuses and plain lies are
irresistible. There are so many theories that the path forward to what some
think might be a just and equitable society is merely an overgrown jungle festooned
with toxic notions and far-away pipe
dreams lurking near every tree. The quest for firm solutions to such problems
is like copulating with coprolites; there is no possible issue so to speak—unless
you are a Californian.
The
Greeks were marginally successful, arguably in a limited sense, until they lost
hegemony of their security awareness and became slaves or all sorts and flavors
to an interesting array of masters. The Romans did a bit better for a thousand
years although they were practicing unvarying warfare with the known world and
many times with themselves. We can wonder how societies progressed from cave
dwellers to high priests and note, with some cloudy visualization, that most
social systems were failures if you care to inspect the outcomes and compare
them with modern notions of societies. In theory, we might want to put up a
rigid set of metrics to measure and evaluate various governments based on human
rights, murder rates, caloric intake, war, opera and other key parameters and bring
into line governments from the ancient Egyptians to the present in some proper
order. When we attempt this we tend, not surprisingly, to notice that nasty
leaders like Attila, Hitler and Genghis Khan have had their counterparts all
along the historical trail. It is difficult to ignore the similarities among
Hitler, Stalin, Robespierre, James Jones, Pol Pot, The Ayotollah Khomeini and
Robert Mugabe when you start to count bodies and look at the supply of food and
tabulate who sleeps where. The salient
fact that these unsavory creatures are randomly spaced along the historical
timeline from the earliest known periods of recorded history, or from legends,
which is probably more accurate in some cases, thus this observation nullifies
the perception that we, as a society, learn from our mistakes and misdeeds and
make continuous improvement in our states. Actually, the data point to the
reciprocal conclusion: we have learned nothing from the past. Repeating the
past is good politics. Worse, we probably know less about the present[2]
than the redacted past[3]
and essentially nothing about the short-term future. [4]
The ignoranti have a cornucopia of alternatives thus broad license to
experiment.
Thus,
we find a compelling reason to adjust or redact certain obtuse portions of
history for social reasons and can safely ignore complaints about accuracy if
the outcomes are potentially rosy or aligned with leftist wishes. Observers of
our society like the Fabian maverick George Orwell have fairly well
characterized the ultimate methods of governments with the following:
"Who controls the past controls the future;
who controls the present controls the past".—Slogan from 1984
by George Orwell.
There
is much to be said about the political efficacy of this slogan. It contains all
the necessary elements to fix up the present, future and past and roll then
into one tight and juicy egg role for all to enjoy. Karl Marx had a grand opportunity to meld the
romantic elements of J. J. Rousseau with some vigilantly selected tidbits of
history, glossed over, necessarily, by
forcing a strict theory upon the helpless little accounts, and thus by
manufacturing a grand plan to eliminate
not only inequities in our production of goods and services but government
altogether. You can have a nice administration that way if you merely use lies
and firing squads to glue together some of the more flaccid elements of a given
society.
Winston
Churchill summed up the results of his opposing line of thinking some three
years after the October Revolution:
"....But my hatred of
Bolshevism and Bolsheviks is not founded on their silly system
of economics, or their absurd
doctrine of an impossible equality. It arises from the bloddy and devastating
terrorism which they practise in every
land into which they have broken, and my which alone their criminal
regime can be maintained...."— Text of Winston Churchill's
July 8th, 1920, British House of Commons, Amritsar Massacre Speech By Winston
Churchill given July 8th, 1920[5] [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
Of course, he had a bad attitude. This
inspection sweeps a lot of mystery, fluff and hokum away from the totalitarian chimera
and unveils in bright lights the sordid prevarication that Marxism was making
some contribution to society at that
early date and, recall for a moment, that the acolytes of Bolshevism persisted
until 1989 in the USSR Africa , it has flourished since
1948, or so, and is the most popular form of government on the southern half of
that continent. In order to get positive results from the process of Marxism it
is necessary to plaster up a stipulation that shooting the dissidents in order
or at random provides extra staples and good times for the blindly obedient
even though the theory for this positive outcome borders and brushes upon the
recalcitrant capitalist supply and demand schedule that was summarily abolished.
A little tribalism helps too. Pol Pot was able to homogenize his people by fairly
and judiciously deselecting members of his society using a reverse cognitive
skill scale. This worked out quite well and most of his people were finally
essentially equal. A lot of knowledge is
a dangerous thing.
This, then, leaves us with a fine
theory, although unworkable as it is in the primitive sate, to move forward and
convince or intimidate the masses with the indomitable notion that capitalism
is at the very root of all social problems. The obvious conclusion [and also
the posted premise before any tedious
research], thusly, is that we must eliminate or suppress capitalism and that
that commission, alone, will offer society the kind of relief from capitalist oppression
and that we need to restructure government. California California
Everything is running smoothly in California Sacramento New York [7], New
Jersey Maryland Woodstock
This was all achieved by being
generous and progressive with hiring state employees of the strictest union
bent, of running the tax spigot at full throttle whenever possible and of
showing benefits unseen in the world to date upon their loyal partners in
government. Gladness is everywhere and the degree of happiness spreads
arithmetically with each and every greedy capitalist who flees the state in
search of a less hostile environment to do traditional business at tax levels
that permit small profits. Profits are evil and CEOs are lazy and stupid. California
Everything wonderful has happened
that could happen except that some Republican has signaled that the spending is
too high and taxes cannot be raised high enough to pay for the current
government. He was actually elected after a recall of a Democrat. There is a
major error here. There is the tacky right-wing problem of debt. This
unnecessary distress that has interrupted this melodrama of late is caused by
the ‘rich’ avariciously avoiding taxes coupled with the constitutional inability
of the state to tax them to such an extent that we can all enjoy prosperity and
sing songs of joy at every special increment in the tax load. California
[1] The state can receive
well-deserved alms from the federal government or elsewhere while the tax
battle continues to whittle down capitalists, private property disputes and tax
levels or…
[2] The state can confiscate wealth
in any and every form and monetize those assets to pay for the current social
programs and cover the 24 bln debt[8] or
[3] They can use the Cambodian
Method of Social Cleansing to
eliminate those excesses that clog the system with capitalists and their greedy
corporations.
With [1] we return to bliss and
continue on building the ideal society. Why
shouldn’t the Other 49 be charged for this advanced instruction in government? With
[2], as only a few Republicans stand mired in the error of their ways, the
natural flow into egalitarianism follows in due course. The money will be properly collected and more
properly spent. The greedy will be made to apologize for their abuses. But, [3]
is still a little messy with the current state of talk radio and other
communication avenues. They cannot, as
yet, pull a Waco California Cuba USSR Cuba North Korea
But, saved by the notion that ‘California Golden State
Thus, the direction is clear and we
need to dig deep into our white male pockets and extract as much money and
wealth as we possibly can to give the artists and innovators in Sacramento California
rycK
Comments:
ryckki@gmail.com
[1] Written
in satire.
[2] It takes
time to explain thing to imbeciles.
[3] Given
revisionism and other corruptions of history.
[4] Even
when the choice is either A or B never do they get up to a
correct answer 50% of the time.
[6] In
satire: The Road
to Social Success, Peace and Justice: California
In Fact: The
Road to Social Success, Peace and Justice: California
[8] Obama to California Battle
[9] Read
propaganda here.
No comments:
Post a Comment