Originally
published 8.20. 2009
Gangrening
the Greenback as Explained by Warren Buffett. Liberalism Has New Excuses for
Spending and Printing Money.
Abstract: Warren Buffet writes
what appears, a least in the preamble, to be a silly fluff piece. The article
wanders about with an inclusive analysis of debt, deflation, inflation and
spending but is rather blunt about impending inflation. This theme is out of
line with Krugman’s assessment of inflation that routinely bores us in the NYT . Apparently out of place in this ragzine, there
are some hints proffered by Buffett for incumbent leftist politicians as to
their survival when inflation does break forth and sink the economy. There
appear to be defense instructions hidden in the fluff and pedantry of this
piece replete with justifications and handy excuses to push off the wrath of
the voters into other avenues and allow reelection of loyal leftist in hard
times. This disguised political survivor piece is similar to the counsel
offered in The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli.[1]
The
quest for the wealth of capitalists is an ongoing crusade in leftist circles
and is boldly aided and abetted by the New York Times [aka the Walter Duranty Papers[2]].
Speaking bluntly, a form of expression that can only break through the neuronal
scabs and psychological bastions of the average leftist persona, we can safely
state that the only thing they can have on this planet is what they can steal
from capitalists, the ignoranti or other worthy and successful people. The NYT is
thus their Medusa who manifold snakes guide the followers through the sticky
labyrinth of political influence and inculcate them with the proper use of
propaganda. This rusty crank is tautologically turned daily. Today we read
something new and, as a bonus, it is
refreshingly free of reverse racism and Nazi scare tactics for a change.
We
must habitually trundle through everyday examples of tautological fluff and assorted
ancillary hokum in pieces by the Times
where the very few principles of the left are touted in nearly every paragraph.
Today, however, we are treated to a novel and unbelievable treatise on
butterfly effects from Warren E. Buffett that skirts around the usual leftist
pulp disguised as economics and finance that we read from Paul Krugman[3] and this welcome variation in style and fact presents us with
a rather stark but focused view of what is really happening in our economy.
There is no apparent reason for this
article to be even mentioned in the NYT
given its disparity from the rote krugmaniacal
rut that locks the Times into stale Keynesian
economic revisionism, unless we probe deeper into the article. Here we seem to
find a loophole for liberal legislators to jump through to escape the several
approaching economic disasters that debt had granted us such as: high
unemployment, spending deficits, inflation and debt. Let us comb through this
piece and attempt to ascertain why this
was published in this setting and what
kind of signal it sends to the rabid left.
Buffet begins badly:
“In nature, every action has consequences, a phenomenon called the butterfly
effect. These consequences, moreover, are not necessarily proportional. For
example, doubling the carbon dioxide we belch into the atmosphere may far more
than double the subsequent problems for society. Realizing this, the world
properly worries about greenhouse emissions.
The butterfly effect
reaches into the financial world as well. Here, the United States is spewing a
potentially damaging substance into our economy — greenback emissions.”[4]--The
Greenback Effect By Warren E. Buffett Op-Ed Contributor Published: August 18, 2009 [Emphasis
is mine in all quotes.]
What an analogy! Many
actions have no consequences. This
paragraph was seemingly written by a butterfly as it flitters from one
point to another with cavalier cerebral abandon. The shifting of the sands,
probably on the order of a trillion gazillion events or more per grain with
respect to other local grains, on the North beach in Samoa
from 654B.C.E. to 974 AD has no effect on either Rome or Carthage
for example. The phrase for this nonsense is known as the fallacy: post hoc ergo propter hoc[5]
and means that some apparent “correlation
between two variables does not automatically imply that one causes the other.”
Buffet has no notions whether butterflies, carbon dioxide or sun
spots might cause future greenhouse effects and has even less of an idea
whether the effect is arithmetic, geometric or
some other mathematical nonlinearity.
But, the use of this mélange of unrelated nostrums that are glued
together in this introduction to inflation theory in such a place as the New
York Times is vague and unusual thus giving us the false notion that Buffet
must be profound since we cannot grasp what he is talking about. He is not
profound. He mumbles, but he mumbles for some reason. This foreplay may be a sop
to the editors of the Times as their
attention span is short and narrow in scope or he may have something important
to say about elections. I think he has a message for the liberals in office.
False status and fears:
“The United States economy is now out of
the emergency room and appears to be on a slow path to recovery. But enormous
dosages of monetary medicine continue to be administered and, before long, we
will need to deal with their side effects. For now, most of those effects are
invisible and could indeed remain latent for a long time. Still, their threat
may be as ominous as that posed by the financial crisis itself.”-- Greenback Effect By
Warren E. Buffett
A circularessay. There
is no reason to suspect that we are free from the grip of a downward debt-driven deflationary spiral[6]
at this time. Most of Europe is deflating and the deflationary aspects of our
financial system are currently masked by the wild printing of money, sluggish money
velocity[7]
of lending at banks and posting trillions of dollars to tier 1 capital accounts
of zombie banks[8]
that are stone, cold dead. This fresh unanchored money offers the illusion that
some of our banks are in point of fact solvent. Now, the bogeyman lurks in the
dark swamps out of sight of normal mortals and may soon rise and search for
food. This monster is inflation and her daughter is hyperinflation. This was
obvious decades ago, but Buffy appears to be the Sage as he presents us with
‘new’ information and wise counsel.
Shifting to things that he can find in history books and
after little paring of the fluff we get:
“… If we leave aside the war-impacted years of 1942 to
1946, the largest annual deficit the
United States
has incurred since 1920 was 6 percent of gross domestic product. This fiscal
year.… deficit will rise to about 13
percent of G.D.P., more than twice the non-wartime record. In dollars, that
equates to a staggering $1.8 trillion.
Fiscally, we are in uncharted territory.” Greenback Effect By Warren E.
Buffett
The
“we” here has no bearings on any reality landmass as many have been down the
Road to Serfdom when money is printed willy-nilly and inflation or
hyperinflation roars. That phenomenon has been well studied and Warren is chasing his own
butterfly
now.
Finally some solid
thinking:
“An increase in federal debt can be financed
in three ways: [1] borrowing from foreigners, [2]
borrowing from our own citizens or, through a roundabout process, [3]
printing money. Let’s look at the prospects for each individually — and in
combination.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
Comments on [1]
“The current account deficit — dollars that
we force-feed to the rest of the world and that must then be invested — will be
$400 billion or so this year. Assume, in a relatively benign scenario, that all
of this is directed by the recipients — China leads the list — to purchases
of United States
debt. “--Greenback Effect By
Warren E. Buffett
This
is the external debt[9]—not
the national or “public” debt. “Public debt is the
amount owed by the government to its creditors, whether they are nationals or
foreigners.
[10]”
That
amount is now nearly 12 trillion dollars or about $38,834.95 on average per person out of 309 million total populations
or for the approximately 60 million persons who actually pay federal taxes a
sum of right at $200,000 each.
The
interest on this debt in 2008 was $451,154,049,950.63.[11]
The debt has increased every year since 1969. The yearly taxpayer’s interest load
alone is now $7,519.23 for
each of the 60 million who actually pay federal taxes. The government is
apparently just printing money to pay off this interest as it comes due. Gee,
doesn’t that just lead to more debt??
Note
that this does not include Social
Security which is in a separate account and taxed differently. That is another
wreckage of leftist government to be dealt with soon.
Note
that Buffett fails to mention massive debt like the rubble of some 5 trillion
dollars in phony mortgage debt that rots in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This is
what kind of debt? Not on the books yet?? The Fannie Mae ‘toxic debt’ alone
adds another 5 x $16,000 to the
taxpayer’s burden since this $16,000
is one trillion dollars divided by 60 million from above. That is $80,000 more. [Gee, this builds up fast!] Notice that
Buffett apparently thinks that Fed Balance Sheet transfers are not debt in any
way and he is technically correct. This is partially true if that money can be
clawed back [read unwound by Tim Geithner[12]]
before it enters the fractional reserve banking system and gets into
circulation.
An article by CNBC [13]
thinks our Fed put out 7.36 trillion dollars around Nov.
13, 2008 and scattered it around
the world:
Here are some financial
hocus-pocus items featuring some technical language. Some of this money appears
to be in terms of guarantees, whatever that means.
Government Entity
|
Amount Allocated in
Millions of Dollars
|
Spent/Lent In Billions
of Dollars
|
Federal Reserve:
|
|
|
(TAF) Term Auction
Credit (allocated)
|
900
|
415.3
|
Discount Window
Lending
|
|
139.3
|
Banks (other loans
primary credit)
|
|
92.6
|
Investment Banks
(other loans Primary dealer and other broker-dealer credit)
|
|
46.6
|
Loans to buy ABCP
(other loans Asset-backed commercial paper money market mutual fund liquidity
facility)
|
|
661.9
|
|
112.5
|
87.4
|
Bear Stearns (initial
loan to JPMorgan)
|
29.5
|
26
|
(TSLF) Term Securities
Lending Facility
|
22
|
200
|
Swap Lines (other
federal reserve assets)
|
|
601
|
(MMIFF) Money Market
Investor Funding Facility (allocated)
|
540
|
|
(CPFF) Commercial
Paper Funding Facility *upper limit from Reuters
|
1800
|
270
|
(TALF) Term
Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility
|
200
|
200
|
|
600
|
600
|
Treasury:
|
|
|
(TARP) Treasury Asset Relief Program
|
700
|
330
|
Exchange Stabilization
Fund to guarantee principal in money market mutual funds
|
50
|
|
Treasury direct
purchases of MBS since Sept.
|
26
|
|
Citigroup
(Treasury+FDIC guarantees)
|
238
|
|
FDIC:
|
|
|
Guarantees for Banks
|
1900
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
Automakers
|
25
|
|
(FHA) Federal Housing
Administration
|
300
|
|
Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac
|
350.
|
|
TOTAL
|
7361 billions
|
7.36 trillion dollars
|
Gee,
does this effort, whatever it might be swamp TARP? What is all this stuff?
Such
funds, if they enter the banking system multiply
by 10 in a short time!! Our M2 money supply then could soar from 8.3
trillion to 18.3 trillion if only one of those trillion dollar deals leaks out.[14]
Comments on [2]
“Then take the second element of the scenario
— borrowing from our own citizens. Assume that Americans save $500 billion, far
above what they’ve saved recently but perhaps consistent with the changing national
mood. Finally, assume that these citizens opt to put all their savings into United States
Treasuries (partly through intermediaries like banks).
Comments on [3]
“Even with these heroic assumptions, the
Treasury will be obliged to find another $900 billion to finance the remainder
of the $1.8 trillion of debt it is issuing. Washington ’s printing presses will need to work
overtime.”-- Greenback Effect By Warren E. Buffett
This
is now trendily known as quantitative easing. This is a disaster.
Buffett tosses new fluff
and watches the butterflies flitter around the room as if we had not heard
this from him already back in early May:
“Every country that has denominated
its debt in its own currency and has found itself with uncomfortable
amounts of debt relative to the rest of the world, in the end they inflate,” Buffett explains. That becomes a tax on everybody that has fixed dollar
investments.”[15]--Buffett Sees Massive
Inflation to Handle Staggering Debt.
Monday, May 4, 2009
By Dan Weil [Emphasis is mine in all quotes]
Now the hammer:
“With government expenditures now running 185 percent of receipts, truly
major changes in both taxes
and outlays will be required.
A revived economy can’t come close to bridging that sort of gap.”--
Greenback Effect By Warren E. Buffett
The
word outlays
here seem to be inserted into the usual spot where the word
spending is used. Is this Newspeak or Doublespeak? I thought Clinton said these were ‘investments?’
The outcome of such
spending:
“Legislators will correctly perceive that either raising taxes or cutting expenditures will threaten their re-election. To
avoid this fate, they can opt for high
rates of inflation, which never
require a recorded vote and cannot be attributed to a specific action that any
elected official takes. In fact, John Maynard Keynes long ago laid out
a road map for political survival amid an economic disaster of just this sort:
“By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and
unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.... The process
engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and
does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”--
Greenback Effect By Warren E. Buffett
Well,
Warren got that
one right. Here is the hidden jewel in
this fluff piece. This is so blunt we wonder why the NYT allowed it to be published. It clearly offers a
license for legislators to print money and secretly accept inflation and avoid
voter abuse so as to keep their phony jobs.
The remedy:
“Our immediate problem is to get our country
back on its feet and flourishing —“whatever
it takes” still makes sense. Once
recovery is gained, however, Congress
must end the rise in the debt-to-G.D.P. ratio and keep our growth in obligations
in line with our growth in resources.”-- Greenback Effect By Warren E.
Buffett
Unchecked carbon
emissions will likely cause icebergs to melt. Unchecked greenback emissions
will certainly cause the purchasing power of currency to melt. The dollar’s
destiny lies with Congress.”-- Greenback Effect By Warren E. Buffett
The ‘whatever it takes’ blather
is liberal code for more spending and phony stimuli.
This
is quite blunt and is truth-in-lending as far as I can determine when we look
at the economics and finance, but the salient message to the politicos here is
two fold:
[1]
To keep your phony jobs just print money and keep on spending and they will not
be able to pin hyperinflation directly on you and
[2]
If you want to put up the world’s biggest tax grab then feed inflation because
that will reduce liquidity to the price of water and only tangible assets will
have value.
[3]
The debt will drop like a dead butterfly when it is ameliorated by
hyperinflation and our grandkids will owe little or nothing if our currency
collapses and the debt with it.
Buffet
appears to offer this idea even though he hypocritically partakes of sweetheart
deals with banks. His comment above about savers buying AAA Treasury Bills and
such does not contain the information that they are going for auction currently
at zero percent interest or ‘zero coupon’ in the trade. Buffet does not scruple
to make 10% on his inside and sticky sweetheart deals and lecture the rest of
us on conservation and EcoNazism[16].
From my previous blog:
We
should live in a world where, like physics, some reasonable laws are known to
govern many of our interactions and economics is clearly one of them. The
elementary tenets of capitalism are well known since ancient times and the salient fact that massive spending by
governments lead to inflation is obvious. Such warnings are common[17]
such as outlined in the book Money
Mischief by Milton Friedman published some 20 years ago. But, there are
economic ‘experts’ and investment ‘oracles’ like Buffett who criticize much about our economy [mostly
for political reasons and Republicans in particular], yet seem to get
sweetheart deals with preferred stocks in companies like Goldman Sachs ,
Dow Chemical,
Rohm &
Haas and wallow unobserved in other deals that the public is not
privileged to participate in.[18] Warren relishes his perch on Olympus as the Sage
of Omaha and boasted that his tax rate was only 19% in federal taxes for 2006.[19] While posing as an investment guru he taught [20] this. He and
many other Democrats supported the massive Obama spending follies that will
surely sink our economy with silence about the cliff we are approaching. His
politics is more important than our economy although he wants to make money
from the current chaos.[21] With insider help he will.
Conclusion:
This
is actually good news for the radicals. I suggested earlier in this week that
with some new 100% confiscatory inheritance taxes following the Communist
Manifesto word by word and setting up ‘managed’ healthcare [read euthanasia]
that truncates the care for the old white folk, then a goodly chunk of the 57
trillion dollars controlled by the oldies can be transferred directly to the
government in a decade or so.[22]
At 5 trillion dollars a year this works out about right to pay off the current
deficit and spend wildly on social programs.
The
butterflies,
are singing about this. Time to rob the bank. A sicklier plan exists only in
the fevered minds of those in the California Assembly in Sacramento . Buffet appears slick compared to
that mob.
rycK
Comments
to: ryckki@gmail.com
[2] In honor of that celebrated Communist
stooge and liar and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for the NYT . The color RED
is used in my essays in honor of Walter
Duranty, a saint, if there could be one, in the Marxist Archives of Honor. Red is in honor of Stalin. Walter Duranty.
“He said
that these people had to be "liquidated or melted in the hot fire of exile
and labor into the proletarian mass". Duranty claimed that the Siberian
labor camps were a means of giving individuals a chance to rejoin Soviet society but also said that for those who
could not accept the system, "the
final fate of such enemies is death.". Duranty, though describing the
system as cruel, says he has "no brief for or against it, nor any purpose
save to try to tell the truth". He ends the article with the claim that
the brutal collectivization campaign
which led to the famine was motivated by the "hope or promise of a
subsequent raising up" of Asian-minded masses in the Soviet
Union which only history could judge.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Duranty
[3] Averting the Worst in
Liberalism as Contrasted by Paul Krugman. Tax and Spend our way to Prosperity.
Rewarding
Bad Actors by More Bad Actors and Higher Taxes: A Krugman Gem
Krugman
Applies Protosimian Logic to Health Care. Big Government and Higher Taxes! Of
Course!
[4] The Greenback Effect By Warren E.
Buffett Op-Ed Contributor Published: August 18, 2009 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/opinion/19buffett.html?_r=1&hp
[Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
[6] The Debt-Deflation Trap
and the Psychosis of Government Spending
The
Looming Bond Bubble and Other Problems. Abandon Hope.
[7] Little Timmy Tells us
Fairy Tales about Financial Unwindings and other Fantasies.
[8] Krugman Scares Us with
His Big Inflation Scare Screed. We Will Rapidly Inflate and He Knows This.
[12] Little Timmy Tells us
Fairy Tales about Financial Unwindings and other Fantasies.
[13] Financial Crisis Tab Already In The
Trillions By CNBC .com |17 Nov 2008
| “Given the speed at which the federal
government is throwing money at the financial crisis, the average taxpayer,
never mind member of Congress, might not be faulted for losing track. CNBC , however, has been paying very close attention
and keeping a running tally of actual spending as well as the commitments
involved.” -- Financial Crisis Tab
Already In The Trillions By CNBC .com
|17 Nov 2008 | http://www.cnbc.com/id/27719011
[Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
[14] Krugman of the NYT Wonders about
Pain? He Should Celebrate the Inflation that will Bankrupt us All. http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/21/krugman_of_the_nyt_wonders_about_pain_he_should_celebrate_the_inflation_that_will_bankrupt_us_all.thtml
[15] Buffett Sees Massive Inflation to Handle
Staggering Debt. Monday, May
4, 2009 2:34 PM
By: Dan Weil http://moneynews.newsmax.com/headlines/warren_buffett/2009/05/04/210480.html?s=al&promo_code=7F1D-1
[16] More Americans Doubt
Global Warming and Other Forms of EcoNazism
Krugman
Explains EcoNazism in the Warmest Terms. Tax Tax Tax
Friedman
Bawls about Balls and Can Show Nothing. EcoNazism and Propaganda at Work.
The
EcoNazis are Frantic for your Money!
A Translation of the
Bailout Plan for Detroit : Bigger Government, Bigger Unions and Cars Designed by EcoNazis http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2008/11/16/a_translation_of_the_bailout_plan_for_detroit_bigger_government,_bigger_unions_and_cars_designed_by_econazis.thtml
Crime is Not a Crime Now if You are an EcoNazi
or Leftist Parasite and Act out of Fear.
Flop
Ears the EcoNazi Prophet of Doom Raises the Spectre of Disaster from GM Food
Production
The
EcoNazis and Reality: Klaus Offers to Debate Al Gore.
300
Years of British Inbreeding Brings us Flop Ears the EcoNazi Prophet of Doom
[17] Friedman Predicts the Destruction of the
Dollar. The late, great Milton Friedman
in his classic book prophetically revealed how Obama's reckless monetary policies will cause hyperinflation and
destroy our nation https://www.newsmaxstore.com/nm_mag/free_mischief.cfm
[21] Has Buffy the Bozo Been
Reading My Blog? Buffett Predicts Inflation—Bernake Does Not.
[22] A Leftist Plan Exists
to Rob and Euthanize Old White Folk in America ?
No comments:
Post a Comment