Search This Blog

Monday, October 15, 2012

McCarthyism Revisited and Revised and a Sentinel Set to Watch for Its Return in the Presidential Elections of 2008.



2/13/08


McCarthyism[1] is famous smear tactic falsely attributed to Senator Joe McCarthy and his alleged work the HUAC, the House Un-American Activities Committee, of which he was never a member or consultant. It was illegal to be a Communist or to belong to a similar organization such as the Nazis under the Smith Act of 1940. [2] This act was later found to be ‘unconstitutional’ in 1957 in several Supreme Court decisions by liberal activists such as Felix Frankfurter, Hugo Black, and William O. Douglas. The Act was the basis of law when Senator McCarthy started his investigations. The liberals rant about the Rule of Law, but not on red hunting.

The beginning of McCarthyism starts with McCarthy’s speech in 1950 in Wheeling West Virginia on Communism. He delivered a speech; the transcript was lost soon after the delivery in which he said he had a list of names of Communists who were working in the US government. This caused a furor and the US Senate reacted by forming  Senate subcommittee was led by Senator Millard Tydings, a Democrat, [MD] and was charged with "…a full and complete study and investigation as to whether persons who are disloyal to the United States are, or have been, employed by the Department of State."[3]

The saga starts here and is outlined in great detail in the new book Blacklisted by History.[4]

The ‘smear’ tactics were directed toward Senator McCarthy [McC] immediately by Tydings and other Democrats on the subcommittee. McCarthy started his testimony beginning in March 8, 1950 ending on July 17,1950.

The difficulty was perceived as McCarthy had merely rehashed the names on the Lee list, prepared years earlier with backgrounds on about 80 people who had been ‘cleared’ The Lee list had no names, only birthdates and employment information and such.  Tydings began by interrupting McC 88 times and attempted to frustrate his testimony. He claimed that McC had lied and had said he had 205 names on list at the Wheeling Speech and took his information from the outdated Lee list. The problem here was that there were no names on the Lee list and the Lee list was a truncated version of about 284 people who had been previously investigated. [5] McC talked about 57. There is no transcript of his speech. The leftists have invented some version of this speech.

At the hearings, despite numerous heated interruptions, McCarthy expanded on his original list of unnamed individuals using results of is own research and made charges against nine others whose names he made public: [6]

The hearings became a circus in which Tydings tried to obstruct McC and prevent his testimony .Thus, the Senator from Wisconsin had to fight the Communists, liberals and Truman Administration at once. Several names submitted by McC had been investigated by the FBI such as Service that showed his connection with communists in several projects with audio tapes. Service was fired and then reinstated by leftist-dominated SCOTUS. Tydings sent a letter to President Truman warning him of the urgent need to stop McC. Truman’s administration was riddled with Communists such as Lauchlin Currie,[7] identified by the VENONA [8]decrypts as a member of two Soviet spy networks with the code name “Page.” Thus there were communist spies at the highest levels of the Truman Administration. Tydings went so far as to show a record player with, ostensibly, the audio transcript of the McCarthy speech in Wheeling, but this was a ruse and a crude attempt to McCathyize McCarthy with a crude smear tactic. This was a sensation in Congress.

Apparently McC got his info from the FBI and J. Edgar Hoover who sent memos to Truman and they were ignored or ‘lost.’ Dean Acheson steered the attack on McC. The fight was later resumed by Richard Nixon [9] This resulted in the conviction and execution of the Rosenbergs, identified as paid spies by the VENONA project. McC said: “However, Truman was president "in name only because the Acheson group has almost hypnotic powers over him. We must impeach Acheson, the heart of the octopus."[10]

The Rosenberg executions are still a cause célèbres for the left as they still think they were innocent and victims of McCarthyism. They were, indeed guilty and deserved to be executed.

Conclusion:

The point of all this is that, yes, there were Communists and Marxist sympathizers in the Democratic Party in 1950  and this is all clear from history and the VENONA decrypts. The FBI was frustrated by Truman and his ‘loyalty’ oaths were but a crude ruse to cover his political problems. And, yes, the left and far left were comfortable with Communists in our government as they are now. Let us not forget the Progressive Caucus with the following names [Nancy Pelosi had to withdraw her name from this organization for political reasons]:

Neil Abercrombie (Hawaii),  Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin),  Xavier Becerra (California),Madeleine Bordallo (Guam),  Corrine Brown (Florida),  Sherrod Brown (Ohio),  Michael Capuano (Massachusetts),  Julia Carson (Indiana),  Donna Christian-Christensen (Virgin Islands),  William Lacy Clay, Jr. (Missouri),  John Conyers (Michigan),  Danny Davis (Illinois),  Peter DeFazio (Oregon),  Rosa DeLauro (Connecticut),  Lane Evans (Illinois),  Eni Faleomavaega (American Samoa),  Sam Farr (California),  Chaka Fattah (Pennsylvania),  Bob Filner (California),  Barney Frank (Massachusetts),  Raul Grijalva (Arizona),  Luis Gutierrez (Illinois),  Maurice Hinchey (New York),  Jesse Jackson, Jr. (Illinois),  Sheila Jackson-Lee (Texas),  Stephanie Tubbs Jones (Ohio),  Marcy Kaptur (Ohio),  Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (Michigan),  Dennis Kucinich (Ohio),Tom Lantos (California),  John Lewis (Georgia),  Ed Markey (Massachusetts), 
Jim McDermott (Washington),  James P. McGovern (Massachusetts),  Cynthia McKinney (Georgia),  George Miller (California),  Gwen Moore (Wisconsin),  Jerry Nadler (New York), Eleanor Holmes Norton (District of Columbia),  John Olver (Massachusetts),  Major Owens (New York),  Ed Pastor (Arizona),  Donald Payne (New Jersey),  Bobby Rush (Illinois),  Bernie Sanders (Vermont),  Jan Schakowsky (Illinois),  Jose Serrano (New York),  Louise Slaughter (New York), Hilda Solis (California),  Pete Stark (California),  Bennie Thompson (Mississippi),  John F. Tierney (Massachusetts),  Tom Udall (New Mexico),  Nydia Velazquez (New York),  Maxine Waters (California),  Diane Watson (California),  Mel Watt (North Carolina),  Henry Waxman (California)

And , yes we have a Communist running for President.  

The Progressive Caucus is now a safe haven for the far left and Communists may do what they wish under the cover of McCarthyism. It is full of left-wing advocate organizations[11] [12] [13]

McCarthy had the Law of the Land on his side and was prevented from presenting his cases before subcommittees of the Senate. He was shouted down by frightened leftists who saw a purge coming. What happened was that this became a political issue and the liberal Democrats used the same tactics on McCarthy that they accused him of using on innocents. This farce persists today thus giving protection to those on the far left who have a comfortable existence in the Democratic Party along with the CPUSA.[14] [15] [16]

Thus, McCarthyism is a useful leftist construct to smear anybody who challenges the integrity or political affiliations of any person while allowing such labels as Nazis, Fascists or other slurs to be a perfectly legitimate basis for ridicule. That is how far our political system has sunk in the latrines.

‘McCarthyism’ is the antithesis of red-baiting.

The Communists are behind Hillary in this election. Their McCarthyism against the Republicans is thus noble and fair in their view.  

All this ought to sound familiar:

The working class and all who work for a living—the vast majority of the people—face a relentless, vicious, and amoral enemy: the capitalist class. Our country is oppressed by one of the most controlling, despicable, entrenched capitalist ruling classes ever, concentrating enormous political, economic, and military power in the hands of a few transnational corporations. These corporations seek to steal, embezzle, extort, and scheme all wealth from the tens of millions of working people, from small businesses and family farmers, from men, women, and children, from seniors and youth, and from the employed, underemployed, and unemployed. They exploit people as workers on the job and the same people as consumers at the checkout counter. Their foremost weapon to maintain their dominance is racism, used to divide working people and achieve extra profits. They work hard to extend ultra-right control over the government and government policy.”[17]

Does it read a bit like Hillary? It is from the Communist Party USA site. It ought to. Hillary now uses the term Swift-boating as a substitute to McCarthyism. It doesn’t matter that John Kerry[18] was a traitor, phony solder who got three purple hearts with three drops of blood and aided the Communists in Paris while our soldiers were dying in Viet Nam. He is still a liberal icon. Bill Clinton spent two weeks in a swank hotel in Moscow in 1969. Hillary was a Saul Alinsky Communist in college.

I hope we notice that this all adds up………… Hillary is a Commie and wants control of the White House, again.

Vote for Obama until later…….

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism#Victims_of_McCarthyism
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_Act
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tydings_Committee
[4] Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies by M. Stanton Evans Crown Forum, November 6, 2007.
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_McCarthy. “McCarthy is usually quoted to have said: "I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department." There is some dispute about whether or not McCarthy actually gave the number of people on the list as being "205," "57," or, indeed, any number at all. In a later telegram to Truman, and when entering the speech into the Congressional Record, he used the number 57.[22] The origin of the number 205 can be traced: In later debates on the Senate floor, McCarthy referred to a 1946 letter that then-Secretary of State James Byrnes sent to Congressman Adolph J. Sabath. In that letter, Byrnes said State Department security investigators had resulted in "recommendation against permanent employment" for 284 persons, and that only 79 of these had been removed from their jobs; this left 205 still on the State Department's payroll.[23] On the Senate floor, McCarthy said that while he did not have the names of the 205 mentioned in the Byrnes letter, he did have the names of 57 who were either members of or loyal to the Communist Party. McCarthy stated he referred to 57 "known Communists;"
[6] Dorothy Kenyon[6], Esther Brunauer, Haldore Hanson, Gustavo Duran, Owen Lattimore[6], Harlow Shapley, Frederick Schuman, John S. Service[6] and Philip Jessup.

[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauchlin_Currie.
[8] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venona_project
[9] http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAacheson.htm.
[11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus#Ideology .
“An array of national progressive organizations will work to support the efforts of the caucus, including the Institute for Policy Studies, The Nation Magazine, Moveon.org, National Priorities Project, Jobs with Justice Campaign, Peace Action, Americans for Democratic Action, and Progressive Democrats of America. Also co-sponsoring the kickoff event were the NAACP, ACLU, Progressive Majority, League of United Latin American Citizens, Rainbow/Push Coalition, National Council of La Raza, Hip Hop Caucus, Human Rights Campaign, Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs, and the National Hip Hop Political Convention. The CPC has long maintained cordial ties with the Democratic Socialists of America, which hosted its website during the 1990s.”
[12] Congress' Red Army caucus. Here was their charter in 1998: Our purpose is to present thoughtful, practical solutions to the economic and social problems facing America," says its statement of purpose. "Our people-based agenda extends from job creation to job training, to economic conversion, to single payer health-care reform, to adequate funding for the AIDS crisis, to environmental reform and to women's rights. "Now that the Cold War is over, this nation's budget and overall priorities must reflect that reality. We support further cuts in outdated and unnecessary military spending, a more progressive tax system in which wealthy taxpayers and corporations contribute their fair share, and a substantial increase in social programs designed to meet the needs of low-and-middle-income American families. We believe that these goals fit within an overall commitment to deficit reduction." http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=14542
[13] http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?sid=2978.
[15] Response to Bush's 2008 State of the Union Address
by Sam Webb, National Chair, 01/30/2008 16:38. “We heard the same old lies, the cheap applause lines, the idle boasting, and the empty rhetoric coming from Bush once again in his State of the Union Address. But this time it seemed more like a final curtain call of a washed up actor who nearly everyone now realizes never should have stepped foot on the stage.” http://www.cpusa.org/.

[16] A Gigantic Battle in 2008. by Joelle Fishman, Chair, Political Action Committee, CPUSA, 11/21/2007 11:16. In 2008 the elections for President and Congress could change the political map in our country. Shatter right-wing Republican political control of the South, end right-wing political dominance of rural America, create big new possibilities for workers to join and organize unions and give new voice to the disenfranchised. The 2008 elections could usher in a new grass roots people’s politics in our nation. http://www.cpusa.org/index.php/article/archive/147/

No comments:

Post a Comment