Originally published 4.11.2009
Abstract: There is a cliché in politics
that goes something like this: we soon become exactly what we criticize or
words to that effect. This notion is amplified today by the New York Times.
Maureen Dowd performs a decent hack job on herself with a raft of sticky
aphorisms and amusingly boomeranging hypocritical harangues while chucking
spears at Rush Limbaugh. Maureen morphs into Maureen and tries to defend Obama
for his political blunders like she has done to him in the past. Her Beloved
tried to intervene in two important gubernatorial races and boogered both of
them. Dowd cannot seem to comment on this and focuses on Rush. Hypocrisy, thy
name is Dowd and thy mirror is our witness.
We are always
entertained by the well-scripted but mostly slanted scribblings that appear in
the NYT —aka the Walter Duranty
Papers[1]--
as they attempt to ‘form public opinion’ with stale propaganda that surges
unerringly along its destined path despite the news.[2]
Upon pressing new and sweeping ‘changes’ in our economy and society that ultimately lead to socialism, inflation,
debt as they appear to redouble the
losses of our Constitutional
Rights not to mention our wealth. This
has been the mission of this turn-of-the-crank screed extruder for many decades
so we need not bother to search any of their written works for a trace of any
substance that might conflict with their sacred, to them, mission. They are
mired in the leftist stooge tank and when it comes to ‘thinking outside the
box’ they can no longer even identify a box.
Their box collapsed in 1989 along with their Beloved USSR.
Today, we are
treated to a rather tautological, highly propagandistic and a nasty screed by
the Old Red Lady[3][4][5]
of the Old Gray
Lady[6]
[Dah Dowdy
Dowd]. [7] She takes it upon herself to instruct us in
criticism?! A stage whisper suddenly materializes: [Does Maureen cook her hair
in the microwave??[8]
Where does that color come from? As a chemist, I know that some chemicals that
color can eat through glass. [9]]
She chucks her first spear at Rush:
“In those days, he [Rush Limbaugh] called himself a “harmless little fuzzball.”
He’s a lot less harmless now. I went on to columny [A clever play on the word Calumny[10]
ed], as my pal Bill Safire called it, and
Rush went on to calumny. [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
As he and Sarah Palin conduct their
auto-da-fé of moderate Republicans — “Moderates by definition have no
principles,” he told his radio audience on Monday — Limbaugh is more than ever
the face of his party, as Rahm Emanuel said.
He’s also the mouth.”[11]--
Who Are You Calling a Narcissist, Rush? By Maureen Dowd Op-Ed Columnist
Published: November 3, 2009
Note the word
association stratagem here coupled with a name association gem! Here we are
led, in a propagandistic manner characteristic of the NYT ,
that Rush is an evil mud slinger and Sarah Palin is his co-conspirator. This is good propaganda but is it not judged
hypocritical when she uses calumny to point out her examples of calumny? Such
are the little tricks that keep her readers giggling in their tutus. This is so
much fun.
A bit of veiled advice to her Fürher Whom
She Doth Not
Question:
“President Obama will have to step it up on jobs and
fixing the deficit
if he wants to block conservatives from stoking the anger of Americans who only
see a recovery on Wall Street, especially given the Republican sweep in top
races on Tuesday night.”-- Who Are You Calling a Narcissist, Rush?
As if all these
trillion dollar stimuli and cash for clunkers[12]
and such have not failed? We have a ‘recovery in progress’ so what be the need
for some stepping up? And, why should
the greedy whites who “who cling bitterly to their 401(k)s[13]” feint anger as they are the ones who hoard wealth
from the poor and marginalized? They are guilty of their sins of the past.
More
name dropping:
“But the tactics of Limbaugh, Palin, Cheney & Fille are more
cynical: They spin certainty[??],
ignoring their side’s screw-ups, and they exploit patriotism, labeling all
critics as traitors.”-- Who Are You Calling a Narcissist, Rush?
The ‘all’ clause here is the standard leftist
nostrum that any remark made against one of their enemies (or victims) is
directed to all humanity. So, when we speak of criminals we must be criticizing
the plight of the entire poor masses or other such nonsense. But, to be a bit
analytical here, can we wonder if some of our critics are traitors? We still
hear that the Rosenbergs were ‘innocent!’ Was Tookie innocent? Mumia? Dan
Rostenkowski or Cold Cash Jefferson?
Some traitors:
“It was okay for John Kerry [14]to
talk with the Communists in Paris and try to defeat the US in the Vietnamese
war. It was okay for Harry Hopkins to be
a paid Soviet Stooge for the Russians and sell of Eastern Europe to Stalin or
for the Rosenbergs[15]
to be paid Soviet spies [his code name was ‘liberal’—how fitting!] who then
sold our nuclear secrets to the Communists. That is okay. It is fine that Mumia
is a cop killer and can have routine radio broadcasts from his cell. [16]
[17]
[from a previous blog[18]].
No traitors in this list of liberals?
One of the
difficulties in creating plastic
messiahs from floor sweepings and
other base substances and the similar attempt to create other but lesser
ethereal beings for less important work [Hillary Clinton] is the tricky task
of preventing the audience from giving
off a few Bronx Cheers or snickers when The One boogers the load and looks like
a fool. In New Jersey, the YoYo Corzine[19]
broke the state with his moronic tax mongering and corruption and he was
tainted with slime
and summarily embarrassed in the polls.
We had a repeat of this in the good state of Virginia that just swung
back from dark
blue to hot red. The six visits of The Anointed One to
rescue his New Jersey lackey were embarrassingly futile and made His Greatness
look like a gibbering fool trying to rescue his cell phone from deep in the
sewers looking something like Old Weird Harold on speed. This was so faultily
constructed it seems to bear the Mark of Shrum[20],
the leftist operative with the highest number of political failures so far, but
the future is approaching quickly and we can expect to see more of these gems.
Of course the Old Red Lady
did chide her Beloved a time or two[21]
in the past when she detected him straying from the Path and advised him to
‘unwind.’
“It’s hard not to be
who you are, but it’s doubly hard to be who you’ve strived not to be. Obama not
only has to figure out how to unwind with a Bud. He
has to rewind his life.”[22]-- This Bud’s for You By Maureen Dowd
Op-Ed Columnist Published: May 4, 2008.
And, a poisoned
spear for Hillary:
“The lioness of Chappaqua is hot on the trail of the
Chicago gazelle, eager to gnaw him to pieces, like a harrowing scene out of a
George Stubbs painting.”[23]--
This Bud’s for You
She
continues to dump on Rush:
“In an interview on “Fox News Sunday With Chris Wallace,” Limbaugh
accused the president of trying to destroy the economy — yes, the same economy
that W. came within a whisker of ruining.
“I have to think that it may be on purpose,” Limbaugh said,
“because this is just outrageous, what is happening — a denial of liberty, an attack
on freedom.”
We
could inquire whether his ‘porkulus[24]’ is really fixing up the
infrastructure or creating new jobs[25] 0r strengthening the
currency or just wantonly plunging us deeper into debt. That sounds like
destroying the economy[26] to me even if it is
unintentional and he is just foaming at the mouth while trying to understand
basic economics and finance. I am surprised it is not worse given his history
and training when coupled with the losers he has surrounded himself with. [27][28] Is
Obama really an Afro-Leninist,
an ideological racist[29][30],
a consummate liar[31]
and a Marxian advocate or stooge[32]? He acts like one. He might become our new Hoover
and bury the leftists for a generation.
The Old One runs out of venom:
“But on Sunday, he ripped the president for having “an out-of-this-world
ego,” for being “very narcissistic,” “immature, inexperienced, in over his
head.” (Isn’t immaturity scoring OxyContin from your maid?)”
“It gives new meaning to pot, kettle and black.”
It is so Greenwich
Village-like[33]
to end her screed with what is doubtless a vain valiant entwine on the most
hackneyed cliché in literary history. But, with the news and circumstances and shrummery abounding in this circus we
have to give Maureen some slack as she has little to work with this week. Things will worsen and Rush’s predictions are
coming true.
rycK
[1] In honor of that celebrated Communist
stooge and liar and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for the NYT . The color RED
is used in my essays in honor of Walter Duranty,
a saint, if there could be one, in the Marxist Archives of Honor.
[2] The New York Times
Propagandistically Distorts the Death Panel Legislation So Essential to
Socialized Medicine and Euthanasia.
[4] The Old Red Lady works
her stylus on the shady side of the caves after being dipped in warm Henna and paints the picture of Bush
Administration failure upon the right with every jab. Sausage machines are cyclical like this. Maureen Dowd: The Old
Red Lady Essays Us on Psychology Wednesday, December 05, 2007
1:13 PM
[5] The Old Red Lady of the Old Gray
Lady Howls about Wall Street and Fat Cats
[6] The New York
Times, or what is left of it.
[7] The Old Red Lady
of the Old Gray Mumbles Incoherently and
Says[Almost] Nothing Today.
[9] rycK's Bio: Achieving Prosperity In
Spite of the Left Posted by rycK on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:06:28 . http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2007/06/12/rycks_bio_achieving_prosperity_in_spite_of_the_left.thtml
[10] A play on the word Calumny: “A false
statement maliciously made to injure another's reputation. The utterance of
maliciously false statements; slander.” http://www.answers.com/topic/calumny
[11] Who Are You Calling a
Narcissist, Rush? By Maureen Dowd Op-Ed Columnist
[12] Imaginary Numbers in the Starry Skies and the Quest for
a Crystal Ball: Our Government Announces Job Creation Success with their
Stimulus Program!
[17]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumia_Abu-Jamal
[18] The NYT is not Serious about Being Serious about
Election Issues: Obfuscation by Omission and Crude Politics as Usual.
[19] A jerk.
[20] Bob Shrum, from whom we get the verb
shrummed: v. to bungle, warp or entangle
and force to fail.
[21] The Old Red Lady of the Old Gray Lady Advises Obama to ‘Rewind’ His Life
[22] This Bud’s for You By Maureen Dowd Op-Ed Columnist Published: May 4, 2008 . http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/opinion/04dowd.html?ref=opinion
[23] This Bud’s for You By MAUREEN DOWD Op-Ed Columnist Published: May 4, 2008 . http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/opinion/04dowd.html?ref=opinion
[25] Imaginary Numbers in the Starry Skies and the Quest for
a Crystal Ball: Our Government Announces Job Creation Success with their
Stimulus Program!
[26] The Bubble that will Burst Higher than all Previous
Bubbles: Depression Looms as the Dollar Crashes.
[27] A. Goebbels Dunn and Finger Bang Rhamba
[The Ballerina] Lead the Ministry of Propaganda for Obama.
[28] Anita Dances the
Dunnciad as The Ghost of Goebbels Looks on with Approval from the Grave.http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2009/10/26/anita_dances_the_dunnciad_as_the_ghost_of_goebbels_looks_on_with_approval_from_the_grave.thtml
[29] Racism and the “Out of
Context Excuse” from the White House.
Lies Compounded with More Lies—the Old Democrat Way
[30] O’Bozo is a Liar as
Well as a Bigot and Ideological Racist
[31] Racism and the “Out of
Context Excuse” from the White House.
Lies Compounded with More Lies—the Old Democrat Way
[32] The Demise of the US
Dollar and the Road to Serfdom
[33] A new word.
No comments:
Post a Comment