6.22.1207
Silencing the opposition, by
any convenient means, hopefully forever, satisfies a basic political tenet for
all players in the game save those who are too chauvinistic to realize their
pawn-like position. Masters at the game usually round up the opposition and
space them equally against the nearest brick wall and introduce some new
variations on the zany Jackson Pollack art work. Stalin was unusually adept at
the game as he managed to cut off criticism by a variety of novel methods and
coined the word liquidation as a tribute to his personal lexicon. Apparently,
the left-liberal wing of the Party of Democrats [nothing Democratic about them
anymore] has blown a main circuit fuse over talk radio and its impact on
leftist elections. They have lost control of this part of the media.
Control of the media is
probably the most important control factor of an impending dictatorship or
revolution next to the collapse of the enemy military forces. The first thing
many revolutionaries do is seize the local radio and TV stations and start
broadcasting that they have won so the
time for peace and justice is now at hand. No revolutionary would allow an
outlet to go unsupervised. An example is the Aljazeera site[1],
which provides superb propaganda and rude political hints and talking points to
the liberal Democrats as they attack the ‘right-wing’ on the War on Terrorism,
just a bumper sticker [2]as
some noisily assert.
Then, there is the problem of
Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and the crew at Fox News, mostly Bill O’Reilly.
The obvious way to counter such a series of pundits with millions of viewers is
to put up your own shows, with opposing views, of course, and offer a tussle on
the issues. Unfortunately, or perhaps the reverse of this fortune, radio talk
shows of the leftist persuasion like those envisioned by Mario Cuomo, Al gore,
Air America
Now, what is a good radical
with extensive Marxist training to do?? Well, Hillary Clinton, a known Saul
Alinsky Radical and adherent of far left-wing radical politics and a member of
the Sisterhood from California, one Barbara Boxer have started a quiet
legislative effort to muzzle Rush and his friends, who are having too much effect
[and fun] with the left. Rush has been on now for about 12 years and is on the
brown list, near the top or the penultimate position, of media types, pundits,
elected officials, judges and such for a long time. He is a major problem despite
the reverse psychological ruse of telling the masses that he is a heap of lies
and lacks any persuasive power. If that
be true, and truth is not exactly the first weapon a leftist knight would
select for battle, then he should have been left to fail by poor ratings and
little or no advertising. Surprise! Surprise! Rush and Sean Hannity [3]and
Monica Crowley[4], the
infamous and stunning Ann Coulter[5]
and Laura Ingraham[6] [except
for Sean we have three knock-down drop-dead gorgeous blonds here, something to
contrast with Barbara Boxer and Maxine Waters!?] have been doing a bang up job
of banging the rabid left and exposing their tricks and tricksters and johns. Ann
Coulter, another blond bombshell, has
the distinction of fighting with as gigantic a set of bloody-eyed zombies as her enemies
since Joan D’Arc or Cleopatra.
The center of this issue, of
course, is suppression of criticism, something the left just cannot stand. So,
the notion of the Fairness Doctrine becomes of interest, which was “present such issues in
what was deemed an honest, equal and balanced manner[7]” and the particulars
look like this:
Two corollary rules of the
doctrine, the "personal attack" rule and the "political
editorial" rule, remained in practice until 2000. The "personal attack"
rule was pertinent whenever a person or small group was subject to a character
attack during a broadcast. Stations had to notify such persons or groups within
a week of the attack, send them transcripts of what was said and offer the
opportunity to respond on the air. The "political editorial" rule
applied when a station broadcast editorials endorsing or opposing candidates
for public office, and stipulated that the candidates not endorsed be notified
and allowed a reasonable opportunity to respond.[8]
Now, just who would want to bring this back?? Well, let us guess: liberals?
You guessed right or actually left. Here is a list of those who support this:
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Representatives Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), Maurice
Hinchey (D-NY), and Louise Slaughter (D-NY)[9].
Well, how did we guess this??
Recently, Senator Inhof (R-) recalled a conversation he overheard by
Senators Clinton d Boxer as :”
"I was going over to vote the other day, and I was walking with two very
liberal gals that didn’t pay any attention to me being with them," Inhofe
told Ziegler. "They said, 'We have got to do something about this, these
are nothing but far-right-wing extremists. We’ve got to have a balance, there’s
got to be a legislative fix to this.”[10]
The two most liberals Senators deny this. But, then, what is the value of
truth in anyting Senator Clinton has ever said? A known liar, crooked lawyer,
perjurist and a person who ignored a judge’s subpeona to relase her Rose Law
Firm Billing Records, Mrs Bill Clinton has everything to gain from such a
supression measure and nothing to lose by lying about it. That is a fact.
Following the Communist Manifesto and other sacred documents frequently
studied by the far left, we cans see the obvious need to squelch criticism from
the right wing. And, as ALL the players above are far left-wing types, we can
safely dump the notion that they are not working on this or something worse.
They need to stop Rush and others or he might just cost them another election or two.
All this follows with the leftist ideolog of lies, legislative methods to
attack opponents, high taxes and other measures. They will do or say anything
to grab power, so what do we believe here?? The left will try to say that this
was ‘old news’ or three years old or out of context or other clumsy retort.
Believe U.S.
Senator James Inhofe, as the other two are slick
liars and propoents of the worst sort of Tax Maggotry.
rycK
[1]
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/55ABE840-AC30-41D2-BDC9-06BBE2A36665.htm
[2] http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/25704.html "[W]hat this
global war on terror bumper sticker -- political slogan, that's all it is, it's
all it's ever been -- was intended to do was for George Bush to use it to
justify everything he does: the ongoing war in Iraq, Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib,
spying on Americans, torture. None of those things are OK. They are not the United States of America
[3] http://www.hannity.com/
[4] http://www.westwoodone.com/program?action=viewProgram&programID=477
[5]
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
[7]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine
[8] ibid
[9] ibid
[10] http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000004892.cfm,
BREITBART.TV EXCLUSIVE: Appearing on John Ziegler's evening show on KFI 640 AM
in LA, U.S. Senator James Inhofe says he overheard Senator Hillary Rodham
Clinton (D-NY) and Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) saying they want a
"legislative fix" for talk radio.http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2042.html
No comments:
Post a Comment