11/26/07
Today,
the New York Times, known alternately as the Duranty Papers or Pinch’s
Pustules, as you please, has called for ‘fair’ and accurate tests for school
children. Now, they cannot do this, in full, because it will expose the
incompetence of some of their best union supporters.
We
read:
This problem is
highlighted in a recent study by Policy Analysis for California Education, a research center run
by Stanford University and the University of California ,
that analyzed the testing practices of a
dozen states between 1992 and 2006. States that performed swimmingly on their
own weak math and reading tests tended to score dismally on the more rigorous
federal National Assessment of Educational Progress, often referred to as NAEP. [1]
Well now. Didn’t we get some flak from the far
left when the Bell Curve[2]
was published, which looked at public test scores and ranked the students
according to race?? That was simple enough. Many of the outraged and psychotic far
left seem to believe that if the Bell Curve had never been written the scores
might have been better[3].
Exposing deficiencies in cognitive skills is a crime against humanity according
to the left .Such are the pathetic political antics of the sordid left. The
test scores continue to show that minorities such as Asians score higher than
whites [about 100 for whites with
Asians at 101-102] with Hispanics and Afro-Americans scoring very much lower,
by an average of 15 IQ points [at 85 or so]. This effect has been known for a
century. [4]
The left will waffle and moan and find ways to ‘explain’ the differences, which
always regurgitate into a noisy clarion call for more tax hikes.[5]
They can do little but glubber.
It
the Duranty Papers are sincere about education, apart from the political
vectors inherent in public spending and political controls here, that they have probably gone crazy or have
something special in mind.
Across
the land, 3000 miles wide and 1500 miles high with about 14,000 school districts
the result is the same:
[1] Half the students
score below the average. This is sad, and unfair, but true.
[2] Some minorities
always score below whites and Asians on average.
To
lance the boil, we might suggest strictly controlled standardized tests for
teacher and students as well and that these test scores be reported by some
reference number to conceal identities but still identified by race. The entire nation then
could be tested at the fourth grade level sorted by race and we could see the
results. That will just about crack this phony left-liberal ‘education’ money
machine in the chops. It will never happen.
If
certain minimum standards were set for teachers and tests given and, say, 5% of
them failed then what do we do?? Why, we simply and gladly spend even more
money for restitution and reeducation and bring these union teachers back to
level!!
Sure.
In nearly all of the
states studied, students did noticeably worse on federal tests than on state
tests. In Oklahoma ,
the gap in scores was a shocking 60 percentage points in math and 51 percentage
points in reading. In Texas ,
that gap was 52 percentage points in math and 56 points in reading. The state
that came closest to the federal standard was Massachusetts , where there was a modest 1 percent
gap in math and 10 percent gap in reading.[6]
Surprise
surprise!! Let the locals define their own standards and presto they will meet
the challenge! If you want to spend more money on welfare just raise the bar on
the definition of poverty and dump more billions into the welfare pot. They
will come running for the loot.
Advocates of the mediocre
status quo will oppose any requirement for a national test.[7]
Be
careful what you wish for—it may happen. No liberal can stand the truth or face
the facts in education, war and several other matters. National standardized
tests will show us who cannot compete, and why, and where the lousy schools and
teachers are.
To suggest
that the New York Times would support dismantling poorly-performing schools and
fire incompetent teachers is a pipe dream out of the 60s.
That
will never happen. They NYT does not mean what they say in the literal
transliteration here. They have something else in mind Watch your pocket book.
rycK
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/26/opinion/26mon3.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin.
New York was
not included in this study apparently. One has to wonder why.
[2] The Bell
Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (ISBN: 0029146739)
by
Herrnstein, Richard J. and Murray,
Charles Free Press of Glencoe , Inc, Old
Tappan , New
Jersey , U.S.A. ,
1994.
[3] http://rycksrationalizations.townhall.com/g/7cb6b581-7e8d-4557-bb9d-97c14b7ecdd9. But, ‘education’ is one of their remaining
strongholds. Here, they choose to ignore the results from standardized tests
for their victims that clearly show they have failed even their own
constituency. They cannot handle the common bell curve that mandates that half
of the people who take IQ tests must fall in the lower half. Many so-called
‘educators’ in California ,
wish to eliminate testing as it causes sorrow and despair among their ranks.
Ebonics may become the official language of Oakland , CA
sometime in the future. We would now require Ebonics translators in every city,
courthouse, post office and business in the nation to ‘be fair.’
[4] The Measurement Of Intelligence by Lewis M Terman. Published by George G. Harrap & Co. Ltd, 1905.
[5] http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/02/education/02scores.html.
“"Look at the nation and you will see across the nation that there was no
dramatic changes in proficiency," Mr. Klein said. "That's why these
data have to be read comparatively." New
York City 's gains among black and Hispanic students
were also accompanied by drops in scores among white students that both
national experts and local school officials were at a loss to explain.”
[6]
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/26/opinion/26mon3.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin.
[7] Ibid.
No comments:
Post a Comment