6/29/07
The demise of democracy,
at least as it might be imagined from a reading of the Constitution, was nearly
consummated yesterday in the Senate when our learned elected representatives
tried to secretly craft a slimy deal to do who knows what, but, certainly, to
feather the nest of these vultures, who roost in the Congress and White House.
Amidst an uproar from the public they tried their best to pass some phony
Immigration Bill that did nothing but allow illegals to remain here, not sign
up for anything but welfare and freebies and continue to work or sell dope at
their pleasure. There was blanket amnesty everywhere in the bill. Usually, such
anti-democratic posturing and law-bending is reserved for other elements of
government, way out of their original power base, like the Warren Court of the
United States Supreme Court[SCOTUS ] and certain agencies like EPA and FDA.
The bill died missing
several votes needed to form even a simple majority from Democrats who defected
as the roar of the polis heightened. The eyes were upon them and they faded. On
the same day, the SCOTUS tore away a bit of Brown v Board, as it should have.
The retorts were loud and clear as the Party of Democrats, having little to do
with democracy when they get their way, were as such:
"There
is so much left to be done and for anyone to assert that race is not a problem
in America today is to deny
the reality in front of our very eyes."—Hillary Clinton 6.28.07[1]
Liberalism survives only
on their racist mechanism. They want race to be a determining factor in jobs,
hiring, contracts, schools and anything else that will appease their victims
and give them more votes. This comment from a Saul Alinsky Communist.
"Let me just put
this in perspective: If HIV-AIDS were the leading cause of death of white women
between the ages of 25 and 34 there would be an outraged, outcry in this
country."—Hillary Clinton 6.28.07[2]
Let me
just put this in perspective: Why not substitute the words black
African-American males for HIV and put in that 1/3 of them will go to prison
and then talk about that outcry Hillary? This already happens. More die in gun
battles in our 20 largest cities than all the lost soldiers in Baghdad since
the start of the War on Terrorism, which the liberals never fail to defeat
piece by piece.
Racism,
of course is the heart and soul of the left-liberal movement in America and elsewhere.[3],[4],[5]
They have little else but to implement
their phony social programs, financed by the taxpayers, of course, and then to
blame the rest of us for the failure of their ill-conceived and dangerous
social programs. They spent 5 trillion dollars on phony social programs since
1950, murdered 20,000,000 babies in the womb and want more and more and more.
So, today we need to
look at the left-wing’s maneuvers to circumvent the Constitution and body of
laws and use the back room deals and courts to get at the tax base, the central
target of all socialists, Communists and related parasites. The Immigration
fiasco is over until 2009, but they will still not close the borders or enforce
the current laws. They will do nothing and just pout.
The case of Brown
v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) [6] is linked to the Supreme Court ruling in Plessy
v. Ferguson. Here the earlier law supported the notion of separate but equal
in several cases. Brown I reversed this saying, in effect, that separate was
NOT equal and so on and so forth. The details are uninteresting and tiresome to
review.
Fine. Now, let us ask:
are people really equal?
The much bashed Bell Curve[7] merely tabulated test scores that showed,
and still do, that many minorities just cannot compete on standardized tests
and busing, howling, set-asides, race-norming, quotas, sleaze and more cannot
produce an equal outcome. No overblown and flowery oratory from any Eastern
Liberal can change the test scores that were covered in the book, and they were
abysmal. They still are. What the liberals wanted in affirmative action measure
was not equality , but forced outcomes that were achieved at the expense of
white males, who were not exactly their constituents, especially if the were
Christians and had blue eyes and blond hair.
Now, the question is how
to change the laws. A brief reading of the Constitution shows us that the
Congress has the sole privilege of making laws and the SCOTUS is not endowed
with that power, after the British or Roman system we suppose. But, after Marbury
v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) [8],
the SCOTUS carved out of nothingness such a right. Not only that, but they also
conjured up the right to veto laws and usurp some executive privilege in
administering civil actions to correct previous errors in law and to corral the
miscreants who defied their own actions. This is anarchy in the making. The
proof of this is shown by counting the number of lawyers who roam the land
looking for fees while they ‘correct’ the law.
The SCOTUS, the only
court that counts, is split on this, for an instance, with Chief Justice
Rehnquist opining against Plessy v. Ferguson. He was not alone.
William Rehnquist wrote
a memo called "A Random Thought on the Segregation Cases" when he was
a law clerk in 1952, during early deliberations that led to the Brown v. Board
of Education decision. In his memo, Rehnquist argued that "I realize that
it is an unpopular and unhumanitarian position, for which I have been
excoriated by 'liberal' colleagues but I think Plessy v. Fergusonwas right
and should be reaffirmed." He continued, "To the argument... that a
majority may not deprive a minority of its constitutional right, the answer
must be made that while this is sound in theory, in the long run it is the majority who will determine what the constitutional rights
of the minority are." [9]
Not if the liberals can
help it! Minority rule, very much favored by the rabid left is known as
authoritarianism and they have sacred icons who are heroes of this political
sector such as Stalin, Mao and Ho and about 150 examples in Africa. No
Marxist dictator has ever been asked to resign by a left liberal and, with no
surprise expected, Castro is the Darling of the Progressives. They want to
closeGuantanamo[10], which will rate rave applause and wet sloppy
bravoes from Castro, Hugo Chavez and Daniel Ortega, just to name a few
dictators with blood on their hands . Heroes of the left like [Vinegar] John
Kerry[11], a known Communist sympathizer, who aided the
enemy in time of war and voted against nearly every major weapons program
during his sorry tour in the Senate, was selected to run for President and
wildly endorsed by the left here in the US, in Mexico and among Marxists around
the world. Jimmy Carter[12] is another example of a Marxist Stooge.
World wide, he could have secured nearly a billion votes. The entire base
structure of the Democrats controlled and wagged by their leftist-most elements
would use a Star Chamber to make decisions as they tried to do in the Kennedy
offices on Capitol Hill in the Immigration Bill disaster. It matters not to a
dedicated liberal or any of their lackeys who use narcotics to ‘feel good’ that
they cannot tolerate laws based on majority rule. They have no qualms nor
sacrifice the least significant of any scruples when they celebrate as some
whiskey-soaked Kazoo-tooter[13] conjures law in the back room along with a
pack of Hispanic racists from La Raza[14] and some fingerlings from the White House,
the Progressive Caucus[15] or even Code Pink. They have no objection
to Rep Jefferson from LA sitting on important committees when he just served
with a 16 count indictment for bribery and worse. Then, there is the case of
John Murtha of Abscam fame.
Now, none of the
mumblings make any sense unless you believe that the courts really can make law
from the bench, as some have done. Why try to use Congress, as the ACLU always
reminds us, when you can get some crooked judge to rule your way and get
another whack at the tax base? The jejune chants in our current ‘law system’
are just that: so much blather by advocates and stooges who try to bend the
law.
So, that is where it
lies: Can we allow the Marxist-trained cadres and their sycophants to corrupt
our system of government?? I say no. We need to defeat these parasites, dumping
some Republicans like Trent Lott along the way, and place real Americans on
SCOTUS where they can administer the law and vacate most or all of the legal
activism since 1950. The next presidential election in 2008 is critical as the
next two justices to rot away in their chars are a pair of the most leftist
persons ever to be called judges. They must be replaced with people who can
interpret what the Constitution means and vacate spurious rulings and dispatch
judges who cannot follow the law. George Bush can carry away the errors on his
back and see if there is anything left of his ‘legacy.’
These leftist parasites
will ruin our country if they can and tax the rest of us out of existence. They
will not be satisfied until we are compelled to give up our homes to the ‘poor’
and stand for hours in food lines as they did in Moscow in the late 1980s. California will
be the first to go down; Oregon second.
rycK ryckki@gmail. com
[4] rycksrationalizations.townhall.com/g/253f4a88-7226-4054-8c25-0567415ad6fa
[5] rycksrationalizations.townhall.com/g/125e16e2-9ef2-4da1-b8a8
[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve
[8] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v_madison
[9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
[10] http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Jun29/0,4670,GuantanamoCongress,00.html
[13] http://rycksrationalizations.townhall.com/g/2f5bbf21-1f83-477a-8766-3027a782aba5
No comments:
Post a Comment